Government removes SRA's AML powers

22 Oct 2025News

Phil Cotter from SmartSearch comments on the government's decision to strip the SRA of AML powers

Phil Cotter, CEO of SmartSearch, the UK's leading provider of digital anti-money laundering solutions, has responded to the government's decision to transfer anti-money laundering (AML) powers from the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Cotter describes this shift as a “wake-up call for the legal sector,” emphasising the need for compliance to evolve beyond a mere “tick-box exercise.” He insists that compliance must be “embedded, proactive and risk-based” to effectively combat financial crime.

With over 6,000 firms and 23,000 individuals heading under FCA oversight, Cotter highlights the enormity of this transition. He warns that firms should anticipate “greater scrutiny, higher expectations and zero tolerance for gaps in compliance.” Cotter’s comments reflect a shared concern within the industry regarding the challenges posed by this regulatory change.

The CEO expresses optimism that the UK Government is prioritising the fight against financial crime, referencing recent legislative measures such as the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act (ECCTA). Additionally, he notes the rollout of digital ID cards as part of these efforts, placing legal and financial firms “firmly in the spotlight.” Ultimately, he cautions that “the pressure to get compliance right has never been greater,” urging firms to adapt swiftly to these evolving expectations.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Latest Articles

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...