Gateley Legal advises Sports Tours International

27 Apr 2026Announcements

Gateley Legal has successfully assisted Sports Tours International in acquiring Golfbreaks, enhancing STI's market presence and strategy

Gateley Legal has provided essential support to Sports Tours International (STI), a leader in specialist sports travel, as it finalised the acquisition of Golfbreaks, a prominent brand in global golf travel. This significant move positions STI strategically within the premium golf travel market. Established in 1998, Golfbreaks has earned recognition as one of the foremost golf travel operators worldwide, offering tailored golf packages that cater to both holiday golfers and those attending major tournaments.

This acquisition follows STI’s previous investment in the golf sector, notably the acquisition of Golf Holidays Direct last year, which was also facilitated by Gateley Legal. The team's expertise in corporate transactions has once again proven invaluable. The advisory team for this transaction was led by partner and head of the corporate platform, Charles Glaskie, along with corporate solicitor Harry Davies, corporate paralegal Tom Haycock, and tax associate Rachel Palmer. Partner Richard Sealy oversaw the financing aspect, supported by solicitor Zaigham Jaffri and trainee solicitor Beth Stilborn.

Reflecting on the acquisition, Tim Przybysz, CEO of Sports Tours International, remarked that “Gateley Legal have been a fantastic partner. Charles and his team delivered insightful commercial advice, were highly attentive to every detail, and showed remarkable commitment throughout. Their support was instrumental in achieving a smooth and successful outcome.” Meanwhile, Charles Glaskie highlighted the importance of this deal, stating that “this transaction represents an important milestone for Sports Tours International, broadening their offering and strengthening their presence in the golf travel sector.” Glaskie also expressed pride in continuing the partnership with STI, indicating the shared vision for growth and ambition in advancing the business.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...