Freeths advises on Imperial Corporate Events investment

24 Sept 2025Announcements

Freeths has successfully advised the management team of Imperial Corporate Events on a strategic investment by Rockpool Investments, facilitating the company’s growth plans

Top 50 commercial law firm Freeths has provided crucial support to the management team of Imperial Corporate Events (ICE) during its recent strategic investment from Rockpool Investments. This deal aims to bolster ICE's expansion into new geographical markets, pursue strategic acquisitions, and enhance access to high-profile events within the global sports and entertainment sectors. Established in 2002, ICE has positioned itself as a leading corporate events agency in the UK, boasting a portfolio that includes 15,000 events worldwide. The firm excels in delivering premium travel, accommodation, and catering alongside experiences at some of the world's most prestigious sporting events, concerts, and culinary showcases.

CEO Rob Poutch remains at the helm of the business, continuing his leadership alongside the existing management team. Freeths played a pivotal role throughout the transaction, led by Corporate Director Hannah Tessyman, supported by Associate Ryan Belcher, Senior Associate Grace Hill, and Director Michelle Wilkinson. Hannah Tessyman remarked “We were delighted to support the management team at ICE on this exciting transaction. ICE is a standout business with a strong leadership team and a clear growth strategy. Rockpool’s investment marks a pivotal moment in ICE’s journey, and we’re proud to have played a part in helping them secure the right partner for the future.”

Rob Poutch, CEO and Co-Founder of ICE, also shared his enthusiasm, stating “This partnership with Rockpool is a major milestone for ICE. We’ve built our reputation on delivering exceptional experiences, and this investment will allow us to take that to the next level - enhancing our offering and continuing to innovate in the world of corporate hospitality. We’re grateful to Freeths for their expert guidance and unwavering support throughout the process.”

This transaction emphasises Freeths' robust capabilities in advising management teams on private equity investments and its ongoing commitment to facilitating the growth of ambitious businesses across the UK

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...