Extra funding for courts will improve justice

1 Oct 2025News

Victims will benefit from faster trials as the Crown Court receives additional funding for more sitting days

In a significant move aimed at expediting justice for victims, the UK government has announced additional funding that will enable the Crown Court to sit for an unprecedented number of days this year. Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Justice, David Lammy, will reveal during his speech at the opening of the legal year that the Crown Court will now have a total of 111,250 sitting days. This allows for an increase of 5,000 days compared to the previous year and marks a record-setting effort to tackle the backlog of cases.

The government's decision to allocate an extra 1,250 sitting days is pivotal in ensuring that more cases are heard this financial year. David Lammy noted, "The Crown Court backlog we inherited stands at over 78,000 and behind each case is a real person, waiting years for justice." By enhancing the court’s capacity to hear trials, victims can expect their day in court to come sooner, which also helps to hold more criminals accountable for their actions.

This funding boost is part of the government's broader Plan for Change, which focuses on revitalising the justice system. Lammy added, "That is why we are acting with the biggest investment on record as part of our Plan for Change." The Deputy Prime Minister acknowledges that while this investment is a step in the right direction, comprehensive reforms are desperately needed to address the underlying issues facing the courts.

Current statistics indicate that there are 78,329 cases pending in Crown Courts, which unfortunately leads to victims waiting three to four years for their trials. To explore solutions for reform, Sir Brian Leveson is conducting an Independent Review of the Criminal Courts. Lammy is carefully considering the proposals from the initial phase of this review, and the government intends to respond in due course.

The outcomes of this review align with the government’s commitment to safer streets, which involves mitigating the court backlog, expediting hearings for both victims and defendants, and ultimately restoring public confidence in the criminal justice system

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...