Eversheds Sutherland advises on five Wolseley UK deals in 10 days

15 Dec 2021News

Eversheds Sutherland corporate partner, Nigel Cooke, led the deal team for all transactions

Global firm Eversheds Sutherand has advised Wolseley UK on five separate transactions in the past 10 days. The deals include Wolseley UK’s proposed acquisition of Neville Lumb, DHS and Bassetts, which are expected to complete in early 2022. Wolseley UK has also entered into exclusive negotiations for the sale of Ideal Bathrooms.

Earlier this month, Eversheds Sutherland advised Wolseley UK on its acquisition of Jointing Technologies and an investment in bookabuilderuk.com.

The cross-practice Eversheds Sutherland team advising on all of these transactions was led by corporate partner, Nigel Cooke. Cooke said: “Wolseley continues to show its vision and determination to future-proof the organisation and to evolve its offering for customers.

“The building products M&A market is busy at the moment, and being able to draw on the relevant industry experience and knowledge within our team to position us as almost an extension of the Wolseley deal team on a strategic level was essential to getting these transactions done in an intensive timeline”.

He added: “Getting these deals over the line for Wolseley in such a short period is exceptional work and shows the value of strong client relationships.”

In January 2021, Eversheds Sutherland also advised the business on Wolseley UK’s acquisition by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice. Wolseley UK corporate development director, Andrew Lea, commented: “Nigel and the Eversheds Sutherland team have been long-standing, trusted partners in the growth and transformation of Wolseley.

“The firm has repeatedly demonstrated its abilities to support us in our strategy towards a future that helps accelerate growth, enhance customer service, and create rewarding career opportunities for our colleagues. With so many transactions in such a short period, it is reassuring to rely on trusted advisors with deep sector knowledge, such as Nigel and the Eversheds Sutherland team.”

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Earlier this month, Eversheds Sutherland advised Wolseley UK on its acquisition of Jointing Technologies and an investment in bookabuilderuk.com.

He added: “Getting these deals over the line for Wolseley in such a short period is exceptional work and shows the value of strong client relationships.”

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...