Editor, Solicitors Journal

EUTHANASIA

11 Jan 2019News

In November the High Court rejected a judicial review of assisted dying policy, stating that 'courts are not the venue for arguments which have failed to convince parliament'. The case was brought by 49-year-old Phil Newby, who has motor neurone disease and wished to establish whether the ban on assisted dying contravened his human rights. However, divisional court justices Irwin and May agreed: 'We struggle to see why any public conclusion judges might reach on matters beyond the resolution of evidence should carry more weight than those of any other adult citizen.' 19 November 2019

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

Interest rates reduced for Court Funds

Interest rates for Court Funds Office accounts will decrease starting from 9 January 2026 due to economic factors

High Court set to hear Gatwick expansion dispute

A legal challenge against Gatwick Airport's second runway plan will be heard in the High Court this week

High performers often face unfair punishment

High-achieving professionals may experience ‘performance punishment,’ leading to burnout and feelings of undervalue

Fixed recoverable costs regime failing claimants

The Fixed Recoverable Costs regime is not delivering the promised certainty, raising concerns over access to justice

Government must prioritise civil legal aid

The Law Society argues for increased funding for civil legal aid to support families facing legal challenges

The UK’s dirty money reforms: from pledges to practice

David Lammy’s tough rhetoric on illicit finance revives long-standing pledges, but delivery, not words, will determine success

Government consults on powered mobility device laws

The UK government seeks public input to modernise laws affecting powered mobility devices, ensuring safety and accessibility

AI in family law: risks and responsibilities

As clients increasingly rely on AI, family lawyers face rising risks, costs, and challenges to credibility

Mark Neale steps down from BSB

Mark Neale announces his retirement as Director General of the Bar Standards Board after six years of service and outlines forthcoming operational changes to enhance efficiency

High street law firms face challenges due to government proposals on client account interest

The Ministry of Justice's plans could significantly impact law firms, leading to increased legal fees and firm closures

Cox v HMRC: Upper Tribunal clarifies penalty suspension criteria

Taxpayers cannot rely on one-off errors to secure penalty suspension

Government unveils ambitious road safety strategy

The new road safety strategy aims to reduce road deaths and serious injuries by 65% by 2035

UK expected to see IPO revival

UK capital markets are set for a considerable revival in IPO activity due to extensive reforms

New plan enhances cyber security for public services

A new cyber action plan has been launched to improve online public services, ensuring they remain secure and resilient for users

Legal aid faces critical funding crisis

A Parliamentary report highlights urgent action needed from the government to ensure the future of legal aid

SJ Interview: Joelle Grogan

Dr Joelle Grogan is a legal scholar specialising in the rule of law in times of crisis. She presents The Law Show on BBC Radio 4, and is Co-Academic Director of the Rule of Law Clinic at the CEU Democracy Institute (Budapest), and a Senior Research Fellow at the UCD Sutherland School of Law. Her work focuses on constitutional accountability, emergency powers, and legal misinformation. In this interview, she examines the pressures facing the rule of law in the UK, from executive power and court delays to media narratives, emergencies, and the impact of AI on legal practice.

Justice reform risks targeting the wrong fix

As 2026 approaches, ministers eye jury trials while ignoring deeper causes of England’s criminal justice crisis