Dua Lipa sues Samsung over image use

Dua Lipa is suing Samsung Electronics for $15 million for allegedly using her image without permission
Following the surprising announcement that pop star Dua Lipa is suing Samsung Electronics for a staggering $15 million, the case has drawn attention to the ongoing issue of image rights in commercial contexts. Lipa accuses the tech giant of using her likeness to market their televisions without her consent, a move that she argues is not only unauthorized but also detrimental to her brand.
Antony Craggs, a partner at Shoosmiths, Member of the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA), provides insight into the implications of this lawsuit. He points out that "Dua Lipa’s action against Samsung is part of a broader and increasingly visible trend of celebrities actively policing the commercial use of their image rights." This reflects a growing awareness among celebrities of the need to protect their public personas from unauthorized commercial exploitation.
Craggs notes that high-profile figures are now much less willing to tolerate these kinds of unauthorized associations, especially when their likeness is being used to promote consumer goods. He cites previous cases to illustrate this trend, mentioning Rihanna's successful legal battle against Topshop over an unauthorised T-shirt bearing her image, as well as Eddie Irvine’s landmark claim involving a manipulated photograph by Talksport that suggested an endorsement.
However, Craggs warns that each case in this sector remains highly fact-specific. He elaborates that "success is likely to depend on the precise rights she relies upon, the context in which the television packaging is presented to consumers and any specific defences in the US which may be available." This highlights the complex nature of image rights, particularly in a global context where different jurisdictions may have differing protections and laws.
As this case unfolds, it may serve as a bellwether for future disputes in this area, potentially impacting how celebrities negotiate their image rights and how corporations manage their marketing strategies in relation to public figures in the digital age.
.jpg&w=3840&q=60)


![Re Beth [2026] EWFC 156 (B): Family Court identifies perpetrator of non-accidental injuries in infant fact-finding proceedings](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.iicj.net%2Farticle%2Ffeature%2FSwindon_%2C_The_Law_Courts_.jpg&w=3840&q=60)
![The Local Authority v The Mother [2026] EWFC 166 (B): Resolutions assessment refused and special guardianship order made in non-accidental injury proceedings](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimages.iicj.net%2Farticle%2Ffeature%2FThe_Royal_Courts_of_Justice_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2952836.jpg&w=3840&q=60)








