LoginSubscribe Now
Follow Us
Sign up to our free newsletter
Solicitors Journal LogoInforming the legal profession since 1856

Find the knowledge you need from the SJ library of over 20,000 legal articles

Search now
Solicitors Journal Logo
  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports
  • AI Search
  • Digital Edition
  • Subscription Options
  • Advertise with Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • FAQ
    • Guide to Authors
Solicitors Journal

Informing the legal profession since 1856.

Follow us

Topics

  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports

About

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • FAQ
  • Guide to Authors

Subscribe

  • Subscription Options
  • Digital Edition
  • Free Newsletter

Editorial

editorial@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Subscriptions

subscriptions@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Advertising

Advertise with usadvertising@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

© 2026 Solicitors Journal in partnership with the International In-house Counsel Journal

ISSN 0038-1047  ·  Images: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors

Terms and ConditionsCookie PolicyPrivacy PolicyPLS Clear logoCopyright & permissions

Defence firm urges change on football laws

14 Aug 2026|News|Add your comment
Share:
Laura Baumanis, Criminal Defence Solicitor, Olliers
Laura Baumanis, Criminal Defence Solicitor, Olliers

As the new Premier League season looms, Olliers Solicitors are calling for a thorough review of football legislation and its impact on fans

With Football Banning Orders (FBOs) now at their highest level in 14 years, the defence specialists warn that many ordinary supporters are being criminalised for actions they may not fully understand. According to Home Office figures, England and Wales are currently enforcing 2,460 FBOs, the highest since the 2011/12 season. 

Olliers express concern that young adults aged 18-34 are disproportionately affected by these stricter measures. While acknowledging that FBOs are crucial in addressing violence and disorder, the firm highlights the need for fans to be aware of various football-specific offences that can lead to criminal prosecution. Some of these orders can last for up to 10 years, significantly impacting an individual’s freedom to attend matches.

To aid fans in navigating this complex landscape, Olliers has released a "Know Your Rights" guide, detailing six common scenarios that can trigger criminal charges. This includes actions such as carrying flares, throwing objects at games, entering the playing area without permission, and engaging in discriminatory chanting. Many supporters, according to Olliers, overlook the potential long-term repercussions of a conviction.

Criminal defence solicitor Laura Baumanis emphasised the importance of a legislative review, stating that while football matches are monitored closely due to past violence and disorder, the legal framework in place may not adequately differentiate between serious violence and low-level offences. She remarked, "Football matches are subject to a distinct legal and policing framework which has developed over many years in response to genuine concerns around violence and disorder."

Baumanis continued, stressing that supporters can often find themselves caught off guard by the serious outcomes of seemingly minor infractions. She noted, "A conviction may carry implications beyond the immediate sentence, including a criminal record and, where a banning order is imposed, restrictions on attending matches."

The call to evaluate the current laws raises important questions about whether it's in the public interest to prosecute minor misdemeanours connected to football. “That is ultimately a matter for Parliament, but it is a discussion worth having," Baumanis concluded.

As fans prepare for the new season, Olliers hopes their guide can assist supporters in enjoying football while steering clear of potential legal pitfalls

Comments

Latest Articles

With Football Banning Orders (FBOs) now at their highest level in 14 years, the defence specialists warn that many ordinary supporters are being criminalised for actions they may not fully understand. According to Home Office figures, England and Wales are currently enforcing 2,460 FBOs, the highest since the 2011/12 season. 

Olliers express concern that young adults aged 18-34 are disproportionately affected by these stricter measures. While acknowledging that FBOs are crucial in addressing violence and disorder, the firm highlights the need for fans to be aware of various football-specific offences that can lead to criminal prosecution. Some of these orders can last for up to 10 years, significantly impacting an individual’s freedom to attend matches.

To aid fans in navigating this complex landscape, Olliers has released a "Know Your Rights" guide, detailing six common scenarios that can trigger criminal charges. This includes actions such as carrying flares, throwing objects at games, entering the playing area without permission, and engaging in discriminatory chanting. Many supporters, according to Olliers, overlook the potential long-term repercussions of a conviction.

Criminal defence solicitor Laura Baumanis emphasised the importance of a legislative review, stating that while football matches are monitored closely due to past violence and disorder, the legal framework in place may not adequately differentiate between serious violence and low-level offences. She remarked, "Football matches are subject to a distinct legal and policing framework which has developed over many years in response to genuine concerns around violence and disorder."

Baumanis continued, stressing that supporters can often find themselves caught off guard by the serious outcomes of seemingly minor infractions. She noted, "A conviction may carry implications beyond the immediate sentence, including a criminal record and, where a banning order is imposed, restrictions on attending matches."

The call to evaluate the current laws raises important questions about whether it's in the public interest to prosecute minor misdemeanours connected to football. “That is ultimately a matter for Parliament, but it is a discussion worth having," Baumanis concluded.

As fans prepare for the new season, Olliers hopes their guide can assist supporters in enjoying football while steering clear of potential legal pitfalls

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
Re HB: a new framework for welfare deputyships
Solicitors Journal

Re HB: a new framework for welfare deputyships

Re HB shifts welfare deputyship applications away from exceptionality and towards practical, proportionate and person-centred decision-making
Practice Notes13 Aug 2026
Anti-anti-suit injunctions in family proceedings: lessons from Potanina v Potanin
Solicitors Journal

Anti-anti-suit injunctions in family proceedings: lessons from Potanina v Potanin

The latest ruling in the long-running Potanina litigation establishes a demanding framework for anti-anti-suit relief in international family proceedings
International13 Aug 2026
Court denies injunction against Potanin
Solicitors Journal

Court denies injunction against Potanin

The Potanina v Potanin ruling exposes prolonged legal battles, with implications for significant financial disputes ahead
News13 Aug 2026
Divorce reforms need better support frameworks
Solicitors Journal

Divorce reforms need better support frameworks

The Law Society welcomes UK government divorce reforms but stresses legal aid improvements are essential for survivors of domestic abuse
News13 Aug 2026
Cohabitation reform sparks debate among lawmakers
Solicitors Journal

Cohabitation reform sparks debate among lawmakers

Baroness Deech challenges the government’s proposed cohabitation reforms, advocating for an opt-in approach to preserve individual choice and address existing legal gaps
News13 Aug 2026
Leasehold reform bill faces September deadline
Solicitors Journal

Leasehold reform bill faces September deadline

The new government has a brief opportunity to introduce the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill before Labour’s conference begins
News13 Aug 2026
FCA penalty reforms raise stakes in market abuse cases
Solicitors Journal

FCA penalty reforms raise stakes in market abuse cases

The FCA’s proposed penalty reforms would raise the stakes for individuals accused of market abuse and make early scrutiny of income, deterrence and financial evidence...
Business12 Aug 2026
Want To Get Cited In AI? Start Writing
Solicitors Journal

Want To Get Cited In AI? Start Writing

Remember the good old days of digital marketing, as in three years ago? All you really had to worry about was ensuring your law firm...
Business12 Aug 2026
New training to improve solicitor competency
Solicitors Journal

New training to improve solicitor competency

The Solicitors Regulation Authority’s consultation aims to enhance training requirements for solicitors handling personal injury cases APIL has expressed support for new measures proposed by...
News12 Aug 2026
MOJ launches funding competition for lawtech
Solicitors Journal

MOJ launches funding competition for lawtech

The Ministry of Justice has initiated a competition to allocate funding and support innovation in legal services across England and Wales
News12 Aug 2026
Witness IIA126 v Chair of the Independent Inquiry Relating to Afghanistan: judge refuses wider disclosure in closed hearings challenge
Solicitors Journal

Witness IIA126 v Chair of the Independent Inquiry Relating to Afghanistan: judge refuses wider disclosure in closed hearings challenge

Mrs Justice Farbey declines to extend disclosure or approve a confidentiality ring for a former senior military officer excluded from the most restrictive closed evidence...
Court Report11 Aug 2026
CBC and GSD v Secretary of State for Defence: Afghan Relocation Policy refusals quashed over undisclosed guidance
Solicitors Journal

CBC and GSD v Secretary of State for Defence: Afghan Relocation Policy refusals quashed over undisclosed guidance

The High Court finds two former British Embassy Kabul security guards were unfairly denied relocation under ARAP because internal guidance on meeting the scheme's criteria...
Court Report11 Aug 2026
SJ Interview: Hannah Field
Solicitors Journal

SJ Interview: Hannah Field

Hannah Field, head of Shoosmiths’ London office and its Dispute Resolution & Litigation team in London, speaks to Solicitors Journal about the firm’s growth strategy,...
Interview28 Jul 2026
The judgement behind the answer
Solicitors Journal

The judgement behind the answer

Foreword7 Aug 2026