Editor, Solicitors Journal

DEBT CLEARED

2 Jan 2019News

A solicitor who allowed a former client to pay off her debt has been fined £25,000 by the SDT and ordered to pay £9,000 in costs. Sabrina Maini was 12 years' qualified at the time. She gave her bank details to a Mr X, who transferred £25,000 into her account and paid £50,000 to her credit card company. The tribunal said Maini, whom Mr X said he regarded as his 'surrogate daughter' and who wanted to change his will in her favour, 'should have known better' and only returned the money when she was found out. However, the tribunal noted she did not deceive her client and that the money had been made good.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

UK defies Aarhus Convention compliance

The Government’s rejection of compliance findings raises fundamental concerns about environmental justice, accountability, and the rule of law

Richard Orpin appointed CEO of LSB

The Legal Services Board has named Richard Orpin as its new Chief Executive Officer following an extensive recruitment process aimed at finding the best candidate for the role

Record raids against illegal workers in UK

Arrests for illegal working have skyrocketed in the UK, marking record levels due to sustained enforcement efforts

Moeve Trading v Mael Trading: Letters of credit as conditional payment in FOB contracts

Property passing triggers price liability despite documentary credit failure

Navjot Sidhu KC v Bar Standards Board: High Court upholds disbarment for sexual misconduct

Senior barrister's appeal against disbarment rejected following findings of professional misconduct during mini-pupillage.

Guralp Systems v SFO: High Court clarifies enforcement of deferred prosecution agreements

Divisional Court confirms DPAs remain enforceable beyond expiry date where financial terms are breached.

Thomas Barnes & Sons v Blackburn Council: Non-party costs orders against litigation funders

Insolvent company litigation funded by family members results in significant costs liability.

New rules enhance privacy for victims

The Home Office has introduced new rules to enhance the privacy of victims during police investigations

Unclaimed estates list reinstated after review

The unclaimed estates list from Bona Vacantia has been reinstated to ensure public access and integrity

New guidance on family court orders

New rules on non-molestation orders reflect a broader understanding of domestic abuse and prioritise safety

Homebuyers to take action against builders

A landmark lawsuit will be filed by UK homebuyers against major housebuilders for competitive breaches

Increased risk of lockdown wills disputes

More people are likely to face legal challenges over DIY Wills made during the COVID-19 pandemic

Green Lane Association v Central Bedfordshire Council: ETRO quashed for lack of genuine experimental purpose

High Court finds experimental traffic order invalid due to unclear experimental basis and procedural failures.

Lamb v Teva UK Ltd: investigator dual roles and procedural fairness in misconduct dismissals

EAT clarifies when investigator involvement renders dismissal unfair under natural justice principles

Unity Ship Group v Euroins Insurance: Master incompetence defeats general average claim

Admiralty Court finds crew competence failures render vessel unseaworthy, barring recovery

SJ Interview: Joelle Grogan

Dr Joelle Grogan is a legal scholar specialising in the rule of law in times of crisis. She presents The Law Show on BBC Radio 4, and is Co-Academic Director of the Rule of Law Clinic at the CEU Democracy Institute (Budapest), and a Senior Research Fellow at the UCD Sutherland School of Law. Her work focuses on constitutional accountability, emergency powers, and legal misinformation. In this interview, she examines the pressures facing the rule of law in the UK, from executive power and court delays to media narratives, emergencies, and the impact of AI on legal practice.

Justice reform risks targeting the wrong fix

As 2026 approaches, ministers eye jury trials while ignoring deeper causes of England’s criminal justice crisis