Court quashes rape conviction due to jurisdiction issues
The Court of Appeal has overturned a rape conviction, ruling the Crown Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case
In a significant legal decision, the Court of Appeal has quashed a jury’s finding of guilt on a rape charge, determining that the Crown Court which held the trial had no jurisdiction to adjudicate such a case involving events that transpired outside the UK. The man, referred to as Mr HY, was initially convicted and sentenced to 11 years imprisonment, including additional shorter sentences for other charges. This particular case stemmed from incidents alleged to have occurred at a foreign holiday destination during a trip with his then partner.
Mr HY's conviction by the Crown Court took place in late 2023, and he subsequently applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) in January 2025 for a review of the case. After thorough consideration, the CCRC identified significant issues surrounding the jurisdictional authority of the Crown Court and chose to refer his case at the beginning of the year.
The CCRC’s review concluded there was a substantial likelihood that the conviction would be overturned, leading to today’s appeal hearing, which occurred before Mr HY began serving the additional sentences related to the rape allegation. CCRC Chair Dame Vera Baird KC expressed the gravity of the situation, stating that “prior to 29 June 2021 the Crown Court in England and Wales did not have jurisdiction to try a defendant for rape of an adult complainant under section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 where the alleged offence occurred outside the United Kingdom.”
This ruling highlights the complexities of jurisdiction in legal proceedings, especially regarding crimes committed abroad, and raises important questions about the legal framework surrounding such cases in England and Wales.
Copyright & permissions
