LoginSubscribe Now
Follow Us
Sign up to our free newsletter
Solicitors Journal LogoInforming the legal profession since 1856

Find the knowledge you need from the SJ library of over 20,000 legal articles

Search now
Solicitors Journal Logo
  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports
  • AI Search
  • Digital Edition
  • Subscription Options
  • Advertise with Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • FAQ
    • Guide to Authors
Solicitors Journal

Informing the legal profession since 1856.

Follow us

Topics

  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports

About

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • FAQ
  • Guide to Authors

Subscribe

  • Subscription Options
  • Digital Edition
  • Free Newsletter

Editorial

editorial@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Subscriptions

subscriptions@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Advertising

Advertise with usadvertising@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

© 2026 Solicitors Journal in partnership with the International In-house Counsel Journal

ISSN 0038-1047  ·  Images: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors

Terms and ConditionsCookie PolicyPrivacy PolicyPLS Clear logoCopyright & permissions

Counterfeit football shirts highlight enforcement challenges

6 Aug 2026|News|Add your comment
Share:
Counterfeit football shirts highlight enforcement challenges

More than 220,000 counterfeit football shirts were seized in a recent UK operation led by police

A significant crackdown on counterfeit football shirts has revealed the ongoing challenges businesses face in the battle against trademark infringement. The Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit led this national operation, resulting in the seizure of over 220,000 counterfeit shirts and kits, which had an estimated genuine retail value of £18.5 million. Six arrests were made, and investigations continue with the involvement of several entities including the Intellectual Property Office and Border Force as they work to tackle the problem.

These counterfeit shirts were predominantly sold through various channels such as online marketplaces, market stalls, and live-shopping apps. This crackdown coincides with the Premier League clubs' promotional activities for the new 2026/27 season set to commence on 21 August. Emma Pitcher, a Partner at Boult, expressed concerns about the effectiveness of online takedowns, stating “Removing a listing is often the quickest way to stop a counterfeit product being seen by consumers. The difficulty is that it is only a very short-term fix and will do very little to address the root cause and stop the person selling it elsewhere.”

She emphasised the challenges brands face, noting that one seller could create multiple accounts across various platforms, leading to a persistent cycle of listings. Brands often find themselves in a ‘game of cat and mouse’ as the same products resurface under different sellers. Research commissioned by HMRC underlined this issue, as many businesses referred to their anti-counterfeiting efforts as “whack-a-mole”, indicating the reality of dealing with persistent counterfeit threats.

Pitcher continued, noting the limited efficacy of solely removing listings, “However, a listing should not always be treated as an isolated incident. Repeated photographs, contact details, payment information and fulfilment arrangements may show that apparently separate accounts are connected.” The choice between quick takedowns and deeper investigations is essential, as effective enforcement can often hinge on understanding the broader network of counterfeit operations.

Connor Thorogood, also a Partner at Boult, highlighted the complexities of rights associated with football shirts, indicating the necessity of clear contractual obligations among rights owners and manufacturers. He stated, "It is important to have clear contractual obligations in place so each party, whether they be the rights owner, the licensee or the manufacturer, knows who is responsible for enforcement.” Thorogood clarified the legal distinctions between counterfeit items and unofficial merchandise, emphasizing the importance of accurate legal classification.

The article indicates the necessity of a coordinated response involving customs action, which can prevent counterfeit goods from entering the market. “Customs action is useful for more than the number of products detained,” said Thorogood. “A shipment can provide evidence that connects an online seller with an importer or a wider distribution operation.”

Ultimately, both Pitcher and Thorogood stressed that a combination of practical evidence and collaboration among involved organisations is crucial for effective enforcement. They concluded that while online takedowns serve as a valuable tool, the effectiveness of trademark strategies should not be measured solely by the number of removals, but by the intelligence gathered and the connections identified throughout the investigation process.

Comments

Latest Articles

A significant crackdown on counterfeit football shirts has revealed the ongoing challenges businesses face in the battle against trademark infringement. The Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit led this national operation, resulting in the seizure of over 220,000 counterfeit shirts and kits, which had an estimated genuine retail value of £18.5 million. Six arrests were made, and investigations continue with the involvement of several entities including the Intellectual Property Office and Border Force as they work to tackle the problem.

These counterfeit shirts were predominantly sold through various channels such as online marketplaces, market stalls, and live-shopping apps. This crackdown coincides with the Premier League clubs' promotional activities for the new 2026/27 season set to commence on 21 August. Emma Pitcher, a Partner at Boult, expressed concerns about the effectiveness of online takedowns, stating “Removing a listing is often the quickest way to stop a counterfeit product being seen by consumers. The difficulty is that it is only a very short-term fix and will do very little to address the root cause and stop the person selling it elsewhere.”

She emphasised the challenges brands face, noting that one seller could create multiple accounts across various platforms, leading to a persistent cycle of listings. Brands often find themselves in a ‘game of cat and mouse’ as the same products resurface under different sellers. Research commissioned by HMRC underlined this issue, as many businesses referred to their anti-counterfeiting efforts as “whack-a-mole”, indicating the reality of dealing with persistent counterfeit threats.

Pitcher continued, noting the limited efficacy of solely removing listings, “However, a listing should not always be treated as an isolated incident. Repeated photographs, contact details, payment information and fulfilment arrangements may show that apparently separate accounts are connected.” The choice between quick takedowns and deeper investigations is essential, as effective enforcement can often hinge on understanding the broader network of counterfeit operations.

Connor Thorogood, also a Partner at Boult, highlighted the complexities of rights associated with football shirts, indicating the necessity of clear contractual obligations among rights owners and manufacturers. He stated, "It is important to have clear contractual obligations in place so each party, whether they be the rights owner, the licensee or the manufacturer, knows who is responsible for enforcement.” Thorogood clarified the legal distinctions between counterfeit items and unofficial merchandise, emphasizing the importance of accurate legal classification.

The article indicates the necessity of a coordinated response involving customs action, which can prevent counterfeit goods from entering the market. “Customs action is useful for more than the number of products detained,” said Thorogood. “A shipment can provide evidence that connects an online seller with an importer or a wider distribution operation.”

Ultimately, both Pitcher and Thorogood stressed that a combination of practical evidence and collaboration among involved organisations is crucial for effective enforcement. They concluded that while online takedowns serve as a valuable tool, the effectiveness of trademark strategies should not be measured solely by the number of removals, but by the intelligence gathered and the connections identified throughout the investigation process.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
Global Talent visa expansion opens doors
Solicitors Journal

Global Talent visa expansion opens doors

The UK Government has expanded the Global Talent visa to allow over 100 companies to sponsor scientists and engineers from around the world
News6 Aug 2026
Cambridge faces aftermath of professor's resignation
Solicitors Journal

Cambridge faces aftermath of professor's resignation

Professor Jason Arday's resignation from Cambridge University raises questions about teaching quality and student impact
News6 Aug 2026
OfS introduces free speech complaints scheme
Solicitors Journal

OfS introduces free speech complaints scheme

The Office for Students sets to launch a free speech complaints scheme in September 2026, aiming to strengthen institutional accountability and uphold academic freedom for...
News6 Aug 2026
Martyn’s Law: updates on implementation
Solicitors Journal

Martyn’s Law: updates on implementation

Laura Gibb shares key progress on Martyn's Law alongside new guidance for event organisers and premises
News6 Aug 2026
Government to change procurement rules for contracts
Solicitors Journal

Government to change procurement rules for contracts

The UK Government has announced modifications to procurement criteria that will prioritise job creation and local investment
News6 Aug 2026
Tackling extra-familial exploitation in public law
Solicitors Journal

Tackling extra-familial exploitation in public law

An examination of recent national inquiries, legislative gaps, and why legal frameworks struggle with extra-familial harm
Opinion5 Aug 2026
Domestic & General v Premier Protect Holdings: High Court finds two men in contempt over warranty scam
Solicitors Journal

Domestic & General v Premier Protect Holdings: High Court finds two men in contempt over warranty scam

High Court finds two businessmen in contempt for false evidence in warranty scam case.
Court Report5 Aug 2026
Domus Living v Edward VII Estates: tribunal discharges restrictive covenant on Midhurst heritage estate
Solicitors Journal

Domus Living v Edward VII Estates: tribunal discharges restrictive covenant on Midhurst heritage estate

Tribunal discharges a planning covenant after finding no evidence the landowner would be harmed.
Court Report5 Aug 2026
TG Jones High Street: court sanctions restructuring plans for former WH Smith business
Solicitors Journal

TG Jones High Street: court sanctions restructuring plans for former WH Smith business

High Court sanctions restructuring plans rescuing the TG Jones high street business from insolvency.
Court Report5 Aug 2026
Edward v North London NHS Foundation Trust: EAT rules on limits of tribunal consent orders
Solicitors Journal

Edward v North London NHS Foundation Trust: EAT rules on limits of tribunal consent orders

EAT holds a tribunal cannot make a consent order once a party withdraws agreement.
Court Report5 Aug 2026
Delaney v Secretary of State: partial permission to appeal granted in caravan site enforcement dispute
Solicitors Journal

Delaney v Secretary of State: partial permission to appeal granted in caravan site enforcement dispute

Court grants permission to appeal on planning permission implementation and enforcement notice timing issues.
Court Report5 Aug 2026
Steven Armstrong v Information Commissioner: tribunal upholds NHS Resolution's refusal to confirm expert reports
Solicitors Journal

Steven Armstrong v Information Commissioner: tribunal upholds NHS Resolution's refusal to confirm expert reports

Tribunal confirms information requester's own claim details count as his personal data under FOIA.
Court Report5 Aug 2026
SJ Interview: Hannah Field
Solicitors Journal

SJ Interview: Hannah Field

Hannah Field, head of Shoosmiths’ London office and its Dispute Resolution & Litigation team in London, speaks to Solicitors Journal about the firm’s growth strategy,...
Interview28 Jul 2026
Matters of judgement
Solicitors Journal

Matters of judgement

Foreword1 Jul 2026