Consultation launched for housing offences

15 Jan 2026News

The Sentencing Council is inviting public input on new sentencing guidelines for housing offences

The independent Sentencing Council has initiated a 12-week public consultation focused on developing a comprehensive set of guidelines pertaining to housing offences. This consultation encompasses two major areas: the unlawful eviction of occupiers and the unlawful harassment of occupiers. Additionally, it includes four proposed guidelines that address issues related to houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) and housing standards.

This initiative is open to a diverse audience, welcoming participation from the public, members of the judiciary, legal practitioners, and those engaged in criminal justice or the private rented sector. The forthcoming guidelines aim to offer the first structured approach to sentencing in cases of housing offences, addressing a gap that currently exists in judicial guidance.

Lady Justice May, Chair of the Sentencing Council, emphasised the significance of clear guidelines by stating “Housing offences such as unlawful eviction can have a devastating impact. There is currently limited guidance for courts on sentencing for these offences; consequently, a risk of inconsistency in how such offences are sentenced across the country. While the number of defendants sentenced for these offences is currently low, it is important that the courts approach sentencing with clarity and consistency.”

Members of the public and interested parties have until 9 April to submit their responses to the consultation, contributing to a more consistent legal framework surrounding housing offences.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Latest Articles

SPP urges HMRC to reconsider pension tax

The Society of Pension Professionals has called on HMRC to address concerns over inheritance tax on pensions to avoid confusion for families affected by bereavement

Progress in cleaning up Companies House

A new report highlights ongoing improvements to the Companies House register aimed at tackling economic crime

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...