Editor, Solicitors Journal

Charities and Appeals Supplement Spring/Summer 2016

24 May 2016News

SJ's dedicated charities supplement is now available to view online

SJ's dedicated charities supplement is now available to view online

Beth Hamilton of Winkworth Sherwood highlights the importance of context in determining protected acts and victimisation claims

The impending changes to the Employment Rights Bill aim to restrict NDAs to protect workplace misconduct victims

The latest Tracker Survey reveals a rise in the use of unbundled legal services, reflecting changing consumer needs

Planning inspector's AONB campsite approval upheld despite parish council challenge

High Court ruling explores arbitration representation disputes involving insolvent Mauritian companies and India

In a recent address, the Attorney General emphasised the significance of implementing Strasbourg Court judgments with national responsibility in mind

Barbara Reeves and Helen Scambler from Mishcon de Reya reflect on the impact of the offence of coercive and controlling behaviour

Rachel Frost-Smith, Legal Director of the family team at Birketts, reflects on the proposal by Baroness Hale

Yanthé Richardson's comments reflect a need for reform amidst concerns over the impact on justice access

Sir Brian Leveson's review unveils sweeping changes designed to tackle the backlog and improve efficiency in the justice system

The House of Lords has passed an amendment to the Renters’ Rights Bill for tenants with pets

Gilson Gray has achieved a groundbreaking win for Rene Hiddink, which sets a precedent for technical directors in football

In light of Sir Brian Leveson's review, the Lord Chancellor pledges bold reforms for swifter justice

The imminent Leveson review highlights critical systemic issues in the criminal justice system, calling for urgent action

High Court rejects judicial review of Cambridge bus gate order amid consultation concerns

The Solicitors Journal speaks to the Founder and CEO of rradar

Populist attacks on legal limits threaten to redefine sovereignty and reshape Britain’s constitutional future, warns Mark Elliot