Catherine Brown appointed interim LSB Chair

23 Sept 2025News

Catherine Brown has been appointed as interim Chair of the Legal Services Board until March 2026

The Lord Chancellor, after consulting the Lady Chief Justice, has approved the appointment of Catherine Brown as the interim Chair of the Legal Services Board (LSB). This role she will occupy from 1 January to 31 March 2026. Catherine Brown is well-regarded in both the public and private sectors, having previously served as CEO of the Food Standards Agency. Currently, she is the first Chair of the Enforcement Conduct Board, which is dedicated to providing independent oversight of the civil enforcement sector. Furthermore, Ms Brown has contributed as the vice chair of the Wellcome Trust advisory group on increasing diversity and inclusion in science and has been an Equal Opportunities Commissioner.

In her current role, she also chairs the Internet Watch Foundation, a charity focused on preventing the sharing of child sexual abuse material online. Brown has been part of the LSB Board since 2019 and stepped in as interim LSB Chair in February 2025, highlighting her extensive experience in leadership roles. The Legal Services Board itself is a crucial independent body that oversees the regulation of lawyers in both England and Wales. Its mission is centred on modernising legal services to enhance consumer protection within the marketplace.

The LSB operates independently of both the government and the legal profession, serving as a regulatory authority that oversees approved regulators. These regulators, in turn, manage the conduct of lawyers. Additionally, the LSB supervises the Office for Legal Complaints, which administers the Legal Ombudsman scheme to address grievances about legal professionals. Appointments to the LSB, including Brown's, are made by the Lord Chancellor under the Legal Services Act 2007. The Commissioner for Public Appointments was consulted regarding this interim appointment to ensure the organisation's smooth functioning and continuity while awaiting the selection of a permanent Chair. This process follows the Governance Code on Public Appointments

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...