Action plan announced for Oakhill STC

1 Sept 2025News

The government has unveiled an action plan focused on improving safety and standards at Oakhill Secure Training Centre

Concerns regarding the conditions at Oakhill Secure Training Centre in Milton Keynes have prompted a comprehensive action plan designed to address the issues identified by inspectors last month. The action plan, released by the Youth Custody Service on 28 August, aims to enhance safety and living conditions at the centre operated by G4S.

An Urgent Notification was issued in July by Ofsted, HM Inspectorate of Prisons, and the Care Quality Commission, which highlighted alarming failings including substandard living conditions, inadequate mental health support, and ineffective safeguarding systems. In response, the government has taken decisive action to ensure that these problems are rectified. The newly developed plan is implemented in close collaboration with G4S and introduced several critical elements to strengthen the facility.

Key measures of the action plan include the appointment of a new leadership team with considerable experience in youth custody, which is expected to enhance oversight and accountability. A Governing Governor from the Youth Custody Service will now directly oversee improvements, ensuring a structured approach to addressing the identified concerns. Improved staff training will also be a priority, equipping staff to manage conflict and violence more effectively. Furthermore, the review of all safeguarding referrals will help ensure appropriate actions are taken in future cases.

Sir Nic Dakin, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Sentencing and Youth Justice, expressed the urgency of the situation by stating that “The serious failings found at Oakhill STC are unacceptable. Every young person in custody must feel safe, supported, and be treated with care.” He emphasised the importance of prompt measures for improvement, remarking that G4S is already taking urgent steps to implement changes and that the plan provides the necessary support to facilitate a turnaround at the centre, adding, “We will not hesitate to take further action if needed.”

Additional measures include extensive refurbishments aimed at improving living conditions within the facility. The refurbishment programme will prioritise areas requiring repair, especially in residential units, while health care provision will also see enhancements with the recruitment of more specialist staff, particularly in mental health services. Moreover, staff members implicated in serious wrongdoing have been temporarily suspended, highlighting the commitment to ensuring a safer environment for the young residents of Oakhill STC.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

UK to raise social media age limit

The UK plans to increase the minimum age for social media access to 16, following Australia's lead addressing online safety for children

SPP urges HMRC to reconsider pension tax

The Society of Pension Professionals has called on HMRC to address concerns over inheritance tax on pensions to avoid confusion for families affected by bereavement

Progress in cleaning up Companies House

A new report highlights ongoing improvements to the Companies House register aimed at tackling economic crime

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...