Redefining justification defences in religious discrimination claims

Last week’s religious discrimination ruling marks a turning point for human rights in the employment sphere but further clarification is still needed on the reach of the justification defence, says Darren Newman

18 Jan 2013

There is much more to the case of Eweida and others v UK decided by the Strasbourg court last week than the right to wear a cross at work. As the implications of the case unfold over the coming years we may come to see this as the point at which human rights law and employment law met and joined forces.

There were four cases before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) which the court combined into one. Nadia Eweida was a check-in assistant who was sent home without pay for some months because she refused to comply with the BA uniform policy and cover the small silver cross which she wore as a necklace. Shirley Chaplin was a nurse who insisted on wearing a small crucifix on a...

Want to read on?

This article is part of our subscription-based access. Please pick one of the options below to continue.
Already registered? Login to access premium content

Single User

  • - 10 issues a year delivered to you
  • - Digital edition of the magazine
  • - Access to premium content
  • - Access to the SJ Archives
  • - Weekly email newsletter
  • - Access to the SJ community online
  • - Advanced search feature
  • - Online support
  • - Access to SJ app- coming soon!
  • - 6 special focuses per year
  • - Special offers on SJ and IICJ events

Corporate User

The Corporate IP Licence is tailored to your firm, making it the most cost effective way for the firm to access Solicitors Journal, and enables the firm to remain compliant with copyright and our Terms and Conditions. This gives you the ability to print and circulate articles within the firm.

To enquire about a Corporate IP Licence for your firm, please contact our Subscriptions Manager on