It is key to establish whether claims satisfy the 'but for' test of causation at an early stage, advises Eleanor Kilner

One of the essential elements of a negligence claim is factual causation. Claimants and their solicitors, however, often focus on establishing duty, and breach of duty, on the assumption that causation should just follow. But such an approach will prove costly to claimants, particularly in view of the recent case of Tiuta International Ltd v De Villiers [2015] EWHC 773 (Ch), which highlights the importance of establishing causation.

Negligent overvaluation

Tiuta concerns the alleged negligent overvaluation of a partially built residential development by the defendant valuer, de Villiers, for mortgage security purposes. In ...

Continue Reading for less than 70p per day!

This article is part of our subscription-based access. Please pick one of the options below to continue.

Already registered? Login to access premium content

Not registered? Subscribe

Login  Subscribe

On-line Web Offer

To save 40% off your first years subscription enter discount code: sjweb40 at the checkout