Stewarts strengthens medical negligence practice in London

9 Mar 2026Appointments

Stewarts has appointed Alexandra Winch and Richard Lodge as new partners to enhance their medical negligence team

Stewarts has bolstered its Medical Negligence practice with the recent appointments of partners Alexandra Winch and Richard Lodge in London. This strategic move comes as the firm aims to reinforce its capabilities in handling complex and high‑value medical negligence claims, highlighting a period of sustained growth within the department. Alexandra Winch joins from Irwin Mitchell, bringing a wealth of experience and a strong reputation for her work in paediatric neurological injuries and amputation claims. She leads a large team and is noted for her client‑centred approach and commitment to early rehabilitation. Winch expressed her enthusiasm by saying “This is an exciting time. Stewarts already has a leading reputation in high‑value complex medical negligence work, and I look forward to contributing to our ongoing growth and presence while supporting clients who have sustained a life changing injury.”

Richard Lodge arrives from Kingsley Napley and is recognised as a highly respected medical negligence specialist. His expertise lies in spinal, brain, and other significant injury claims linked to surgical negligence or misdiagnosis. Lodge's qualifications include accreditation from the Law Society and AvMA, along with a ranking in Chambers and Legal 500, where he is acknowledged for his meticulous approach and technical insight. Reflecting on his move, he stated “I’m delighted to be joining Stewarts at such a pivotal moment for the Medical Negligence team. The firm’s ambition and focus on excellence resonate strongly with me. I look forward to contributing to the continued development of the Stewarts’ Medical Negligence practice and supporting clients through complex litigation following a life-changing injury.”

In addition to these appointments, the Leeds office recently welcomed Iain Dodd and Guy Pomphrey, further elevating the firm’s prowess in the field. Alexandra and Richard’s presence in London will strengthen the collaboration with their colleagues in Leeds, enhancing support for clients nationwide who have faced life-altering injuries from negligent medical treatment.

Anita Jewitt, partner and head of the Medical Negligence department, remarked on the new arrivals, stating “Our practice continues to grow at pace, and we are delighted to welcome Richard and Alexandra to the team. Their outstanding expertise in high‑value spinal, brain, birth injury and amputation claims significantly enhances our capability and deepens our experience acting for clients who have sustained life changing injuries. Their arrival marks an important step in reinforcing our position as a leading disputes practice specialising in the most complex medical negligence cases.”

Stewarts’ Medical Negligence team focuses exclusively on cases of high severity, including those related to brain injury, spinal cord injury, birth injuries, cerebral palsy, and amputation. The practice is pivotal to the firm, sitting alongside its notable Personal Injury, Aviation, and International Injury practices. Managing partner Stuart Dench summarised the recent developments by stating “The appointment of four new partners in quick succession to the Medical Negligence practice reflects the strength and continued momentum Anita has created. With Alexandra and Richard joining in London, alongside Iain and Guy in Leeds, we are expanding our depth and ensuring we remain the firm of choice for the most complex and life‑changing medical negligence cases.”

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

Employment tribunal delays are reshaping litigation strategy

Prolonged Tribunal backlogs are transforming employer strategy, settlement dynamics, and case management

Crisis in legal sector parent support

A recent survey indicates legal sector parents experience higher stress than those in other industries, raising alarm

CILEX urges regulators to enhance access

CILEX criticises legal regulators for not doing enough to improve access and diversity within the legal profession

Swire v Canterbury City Council: EIA screening, park and ride capacity, and the limits of cumulative assessment

High Court dismisses judicial review of A2 slip road planning permission — [2026] EWHC 478 (Admin)

Shah Ali v General Medical Council: erasure upheld following persistent lack of insight

A doctor's removal from the medical register was confirmed after successive tribunals identified an entrenched failure to accept responsibility for two serious matters.

XY, Re: welfare deputyship, internet use and the court's ultimate authority

Internet and social media decisions fall outside standard welfare deputyship authority; the Court of Protection retains ultimate best interests jurisdiction regardless of deputy appointment.

Secretary of State for the Home Department v AB: subjective fear and the limits of deportation appeals

Deportation, Article 8, and the weight of subjective fear in relocation assessments

Zinda v Ark Schools: fraud claim to set aside judgement fails where evidence was always in claimant's possession

Setting aside a judgement for fraud requires new evidence, conscious dishonesty, and materiality — none of which were established here.

$Re A, B and C: Court of Appeal upholds mother as perpetrator of non-accidental fracture in care proceedings$

Re A, B and C: Court of Appeal upholds mother as perpetrator of non-accidental fracture in care proceedings

Witness credibility and delayed medical attention central to perpetrator finding

Aksahin v London Borough of Enfield: passengers, car cruising injunctions and contempt of court

A passenger in a car cruising vehicle can be found in contempt of court even where they claim to have discouraged the driver, and good service of an injunction against persons unknown is sufficient to fix a defendant with knowledge of its terms.

Heidrych v District Court in Bydgoszcz: fugitivity, delay and the Article 8 balance in extradition proceedings

Renewed application for permission to appeal refused where six-year certification delay did not displace public interest in extradition.

High Court considers Afghan relocation claims

The High Court has approved a judicial review of the ARAP decision regarding a former Afghan official's relocation eligibility

OpenID Foundation advocates digital estate standards

The OpenID Foundation emphasises the need for coordinated action to address digital estate management issues

Roberts v Severn Trent Water: when does section 18(8) of the Water Industry Act 1991 bar competition claims?

A class representative's competition claim against six water companies is barred where the alleged abuse of dominance cannot be separated from a breach of licence conditions under the Water Industry Act 1991.

Kay v Martineau Johnson: when does time begin to run under section 14A for solicitor negligence claims?

A claimant's dissatisfaction with a settlement does not, without more, start the limitation clock.

SJ Interview: Ben Aram

Ben Aram is UK Managing Partner at Kennedys and co-head of its Corporate & Commercial division. A solicitor specialising in international arbitration and commercial litigation, he has led the expansion of the firm’s UK corporate practice and helped launch its global ESG group. In this interview, he reflects on law-firm leadership, scaling practices, partnership governance, and the skills lawyers need in a changing market.

Power Shifts, Responsibility Holds

From AI liability and freezing injunctions to private equity governance and regulatory reform, this issue traces a legal system adapting to new pressures while keeping accountability firmly human.