News EditorSolicitors Journal

Solicitors Regulation Authority finalises rules for post six-year run-off cover

Solicitors Regulation Authority finalises rules for post six-year run-off cover

Board agrees final rules to bring SIF under SRA control

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) announced on 15 February that its Board has finalised new rules that will bring the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) within its remit to guarantee consumer protection for post six-year negligence claims.  

According to the new rules, post six-year protection will become part of the SRA’s regulatory arrangements and oversight, following the expiry of SIF’s current arrangements on 30 September 2023. The SIF was established by the Law Society of England and Wales in 1987 pursuant to the Solicitors Act 1974, in order to provide compulsory professional indemnity cover to all solicitor practices in England and Wales.

In light of the prospective closure of SIF, and the unavailability of alternative options for long-term run-off cover, the SRA held a consultation in early 2022, to gather stakeholder views on the future of SIF and post six-year run-off cover. Following a review of the responses received, the SRA adapted its initial proposal, which includes updates to the process for when an arbitrator is required.

The SRA’s finalised rules, which will see the new operations and arrangements go live on 1 October 2023, will now be submitted to the Legal Services Board for approval.

According to the SRA, the changes to the arrangements on SIF and post six-year run-off cover will reduce the running costs of the operation, which will result in more funds being available to settle claims. Relatedly, the SRA has also confirmed that it does not expect to levy the profession to obtain more funds for the scheme in the near future. However, a consultation may be needed in future to help the SRA decide on the fund's long-term financial arrangements.

SRA Chief Executive, Paul Philip, said, “Across all the consultations we have run on post six-year cover there has been a consistent theme that both the public and profession value the protections the SIF provides. The SRA-run scheme will provide assurance for all that there is ongoing protection for clients. By running the scheme we can make sure it runs as efficiently and effectively as possible. The feedback we received was useful and we have made some changes in response. Others also questioned whether we had the expertise to run an indemnity scheme, so it's worth clarifying that we will be engaging external experts to help us further develop and then deliver the day-to-day operation of the scheme.”

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Attorney General presents UK intervention in Ukraine case against Russia at International Court of Justice

Thu Sep 21 2023

Firms losing potential clients by failing to return their calls, research shows

Thu Sep 21 2023

Powers of attorney modernised as legislation allows CILEX Lawyers to certify LPA copies for the first time

Thu Sep 21 2023

Stark contrast between Government response to Post Office Horizon victims and Infected Blood

Wed Sep 20 2023

ACSO comments on the Justice select Committee report:

Wed Sep 20 2023

Campaigners win permission to appeal against Sizewell C Nuclear Power Station ruling

Tue Sep 19 2023

Pre-inquest review into the deaths of Reading murder victims, James Furlong, Dr David Wails and Joseph Ritchie-Bennett

Mon Sep 18 2023

Feedback launches legal challenge to decision not to require food waste reporting

Fri Sep 15 2023

Failed whiplash reforms have created a ‘clear justice gap’

Thu Sep 14 2023
FeaturedThe Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA
The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA
Lessons in leadership from the front line
Lessons in leadership from the front line
Birdnesting and mortgages in divorce
Birdnesting and mortgages in divorce
Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood InquirySJ Interview: Chris Benson
SJ Interview: Chris Benson
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?