EditorSolicitors Journal
Quotation Marks

O’Neil’s conduct was deliberate, calculated and with blatant self-interest; and he had shown no real insight or remorse

Solicitor driven by financial gain struck off

Solicitor driven by financial gain struck off

A solicitor with a long, unblemished career was struck off for regulatory breaches motivated by financial gain. Vincent O’Neil was a partner at Town and Country Property Lawyers in 2014 when he agreed to buy a property from a family member, a client in relation to a related transaction. He failed to complete the purchase and discharge a mortgage – but failed to tell the client. O’Neil then continued acting on behalf of that client and another family member in a linked purchase, knowing a conflict had arisen or that there was a significant risk of conflict. He had also failed to disclose that the balance of the purchase monies for the linked property purchase would not be coming from the earlier sale.

O’Neill’s dishonestly resulted in a misleading certificate of title being sent to a lender client by a partner at his firm who had relied on and trusted him. He attempted to justify his actions as assisting family members, but the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) found financial gain was his motivation.

The SDT described O’Neil’s conduct as deliberate, calculated and with “blatant self-interest”; and he had shown no real insight or remorse. He was struck off and ordered to pay £11,081.00 in costs.

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023

Attorney General presents UK intervention in Ukraine case against Russia at International Court of Justice

Thu Sep 21 2023

Firms losing potential clients by failing to return their calls, research shows

Thu Sep 21 2023

Powers of attorney modernised as legislation allows CILEX Lawyers to certify LPA copies for the first time

Thu Sep 21 2023

Stark contrast between Government response to Post Office Horizon victims and Infected Blood

Wed Sep 20 2023

ACSO comments on the Justice select Committee report:

Wed Sep 20 2023

Campaigners win permission to appeal against Sizewell C Nuclear Power Station ruling

Tue Sep 19 2023

Pre-inquest review into the deaths of Reading murder victims, James Furlong, Dr David Wails and Joseph Ritchie-Bennett

Mon Sep 18 2023
FeaturedAudit reform: if not now, when?
Audit reform: if not now, when?
Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero
Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero
The battle for talent – promoting diversity
The battle for talent – promoting diversity
BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social mediaSJ interview: Adrian Chopin
SJ interview: Adrian Chopin
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?