The Society has urged the government to extend the timeline for reform
As the Retained EU Law Bill enters its final stage in the House of Commons today (18 January 2023), the Law Society said the bill “would rock legal certainty in the UK and undermine the country’s status as an internationally competitive business environment”.
Law Society president, Lubna Shuja, said the speed at which the government proposes to review retained EU law “is a recipe for bad law-making”.
“As it stands the bill would entail bypassing parliamentary scrutiny and stakeholder consultation by giving Ministers the power to independently revoke, restate, replace or update retained EU law,” said Shuja.
“The net result of this unnecessary haste and over-reach is likely to be a period of uncertainty over the status of regulations that would affect consumers, business, government departments and the courts”.
The Law Society has urged the government to extend the timeline for reform and remove the deadline of 31 December 2023 for reviewing retained law.
Shuja commented: “If enacted as is, the bill could lead to different interpretations of the law by different courts and to the nations of the UK enforcing different regulations. This would not only unbalance the devolution settlements, it could also lead to legal confusion for businesses and consumers for decades to come”.
The Law Society president particularly highlighted that clause 7 takes the “highly unusual step” of giving powers to the law Officers – the Attorney General, the Solicitor General and the Advocate General – to interfere in civil litigation after a case has concluded. Shuja said this was “contrary to the interests of justice and the rule of law”.
“Our members – solicitors – are particularly concerned workers could lose access to long-established rights that now form an integral part of Britain’s reputation as a fair society, such as holiday pay or protection against fire and rehire,” concluded Shuja.
“We call on the Government to publish an exhaustive list of every piece of legislation being revoked under the sunset clause to ensure adequate scrutiny of what will be lost.”
Tags:Dr Hamid Harasani and Samaher Alsobeihy explore how Saudi Arabia has reformed its companies law per its Vision 2030 ambitions
Samantha Farndale explores how family lawyers can recognise and address love-bombing in abusive relationships
Ashish Mehta examines the data protection regime under the new federal personal data protection law in the UAE
While India offers many attractive investment opportunities, there are various regulatory factors to be aware of
The Solicitors Journal spoke to James Fulforth, Kingsley Napley’s newly appointed Senior Partner, about his experiences in the law, his thoughts on the UK’s tech sector and what he hopes to achieve in his new role
Sophie Cameron takes a look at the news in the April Foreword