EditorSolicitors Journal

Queen's Speech: government mustn't undermine justice, says Law Society

Queen's Speech: government mustn't undermine justice, says Law Society

Rights are meaningless if people cannot defend or realise them, the Law Society warns

Prime minister Boris Johnson used today’s Queen's Speech to commit to “strengthen and renew democracy and the constitution”, with forthcoming legislation to “restore the balance of power between the executive, legislature and the court”. This would include a Judicial Review Bill

However, the Law Society of England and Wales warned that the rule of law must underpin every step of the UK’s post-pandemic recovery.

Responding to the Queen’s Speech, the Society’s president I. Stephanie Boyce said: “As the government looks to rebuild after the pandemic it should ensure its plans don’t fly in face of our British values.”

In a recent Law Society poll, 94 per cent of people said they think it was important the UK is seen as a country which upholds the law.

Boyce added: “Britons overwhelmingly want their country to be a beacon of the rule of law with rules applying equally regardless of the individual or the institution.”

But she says the proposals on judicial review “risk taking power away from citizens and putting more into the hands of government. The rule of law and access to justice would be significantly weakened”.

“The independent panel convened by government to review the relationship between the courts and the state found no evidence of judicial overreach”, added Boyce. “Judicial review is an essential check on power. 

“It keeps government and public bodies on the straight and narrow and allows individuals to uphold their rights when faced with the might of the state.

“The effect of government proposals would be a fundamental distortion of the protection judicial review is supposed to provide against state action, undermining the rule of law and restricting access to justice.”

It was also announced that measures to be set out under the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill would be brought in to increase sentences for the most serious and violent offences

However, Boyce said without wider investment in the justice system, the measures “may be doomed to fall short”.

She warned: “The justice system – which is essential to maintaining law and order for the safety of us all – is on its knees.”

“Rights are meaningless if people cannot defend or realise them – whether because they can’t get legal aid, because of huge delays in the courts or because avenues for redress such as judicial review have been watered down”, she added.
 

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Axiom Ince collapses: Police investigation begins

Tue Oct 03 2023

Barrister Carly Walters ordered to be disbarred

Tue Oct 03 2023

Fines to increase for employers without robust employment screening

Mon Oct 02 2023

IBA publishes for the first time a legal agenda identifying profession’s most pressing concerns

Mon Oct 02 2023

Black History Month: Legal profession celebrates influential Black women lawyers

Mon Oct 02 2023

The Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid

Fri Sep 29 2023

Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce

Fri Sep 29 2023

Families continue to be victims of a broken justice system

Fri Sep 29 2023

Call for compensation scheme extension to help more abuse survivors

Fri Sep 29 2023
FeaturedChris Packham legal action over Rishi Sunak's announcement
Chris Packham legal action over Rishi Sunak's announcement
Why civil mediation is the smarter choice than pressing for your day in court
Why civil mediation is the smarter choice than pressing for your day in court
SRA now managing the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
SRA now managing the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
Law Society concerned over fixed recoverable costs rollout
Law Society concerned over fixed recoverable costs rollout
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?