EditorSolicitors Journal
Quotation Marks

It is important that we are prepared to make sure the transition to any new arrangements takes place as seamlessly as possible

QLTS: SRA unveils plans for no-deal Brexit

QLTS: SRA unveils plans for no-deal Brexit

The Solicitors Regulations Authority (SRA) has confirmed potential changes to its rules regarding non-UK solicitors in case the country leaves the EU without a deal at the end of the month. The regulator has said that in the case of a no-deal Brexit all foreign lawyers will be able to apply for exemptions from the Qualified Lawyers Transfer Scheme (QLTS), were previously this only applied to lawyers from the EU. The news was unveiled at an SRA media briefing on 19 March, just as news broke that prime minister Teresa May had written to EU Council President Donald Tusk requesting to delay Brexit until 30 June.

This led the board to clarify that the change will only apply in the case of a no-deal Brexit, “if it doesn’t happen then our chair reneges the rule change”, chief executive Paul Philip said. Executive director of external and corporate affairs Jane Malcolm said any extension to the current situation would only mean that changes were delayed until that point, when a no-deal Brexit may still be a potential outcome. The rule change, which would come into force as soon as no-deal withdrawal from the EU was enacted, would be on the condition that foreign lawyers cover either the entirety or both parts of the QLTS. The exemptions would still only be granted on the basis of a case-by-case review of that lawyer’s qualifications and experience.

The regulator also confirmed that regardless of the outcome of Brexit negotiations, arrangements for solicitors from Scotland and Northern Ireland would not change. EU-based lawyers wishing to apply under the present court exemptions regime can still do so, providing their application is received before the date that any no-deal Brexit becomes effective. Philip said: “Whatever the outcome of the negotiations it is important that we are prepared to make sure the transition to any new arrangements takes place as seamlessly as possible, with as little disruption as possible for. The profession or the public who need their services.”

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023

Attorney General presents UK intervention in Ukraine case against Russia at International Court of Justice

Thu Sep 21 2023

Firms losing potential clients by failing to return their calls, research shows

Thu Sep 21 2023

Powers of attorney modernised as legislation allows CILEX Lawyers to certify LPA copies for the first time

Thu Sep 21 2023

Stark contrast between Government response to Post Office Horizon victims and Infected Blood

Wed Sep 20 2023

ACSO comments on the Justice select Committee report:

Wed Sep 20 2023

Campaigners win permission to appeal against Sizewell C Nuclear Power Station ruling

Tue Sep 19 2023

Pre-inquest review into the deaths of Reading murder victims, James Furlong, Dr David Wails and Joseph Ritchie-Bennett

Mon Sep 18 2023
FeaturedAudit reform: if not now, when?
Audit reform: if not now, when?
Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero
Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero
The battle for talent – promoting diversity
The battle for talent – promoting diversity
BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social mediaSJ interview: Adrian Chopin
SJ interview: Adrian Chopin
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?