News

Paul Hastings advised Infopro Digital with the issuance of €500 million

Paul Hastings Advises Infopro Digital on €975 Million High Yield Issuance

Fri Jun 23 2023News

Paul Hastings LLP has advised Infopro Digital in connection with the issuance of €500 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.0% senior secured notes due 2028 and €475 million in aggregate principal amount of senior secured floating rate notes due 2028.

Infopro Digital, a portfolio company of private equity fund TowerBrook, offers innovative B2B information and technology services and solutions for professional communities, including clients in the construction and public sectors, the automotive aftermarket and the risk, compliance and insurance industry.

The notes were issued in connection with TowerBrook’s fund-to-fund acquisition of Infopro Digital. Following this acquisition, the equity investors in Infopro Digital will include TowerBrook, certain financial co-investors, and the management team, including the founder of Infopro Digital, Christophe Czajka.

The proceeds from the issuance will be used to redeem Infopro Digital’s existing senior secured notes, as well as to make certain payments to shareholders.

Global Finance partner Patrick Bright led the Paul Hastings team, which also included of counsel Jemma Lohr McPherson, alongside associates Adnane Ayeb and Rebecca Bunyan.

Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats

Mon Sep 25 2023

Legal Departments See Higher Matter Volumes but Flat or Declining Budgets: Thomson Reuters 2023 Legal Department Operations Index

Mon Sep 25 2023

More Than 200 Employers Named And Shamed For Failing To Pay National Minimum Wage

Mon Sep 25 2023

Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero

Fri Sep 22 2023

BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social media

Fri Sep 22 2023

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023

Attorney General presents UK intervention in Ukraine case against Russia at International Court of Justice

Thu Sep 21 2023

Firms losing potential clients by failing to return their calls, research shows

Thu Sep 21 2023

FeaturedChanging tactics in litigation – crystal ball gazing

FeatureTue Sep 26 2023

Changing tactics in litigation – crystal ball gazing

Diane Parker discusses the potential consequences of the forthcoming intermediate track for civil claims.

UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation

NewsTue Sep 26 2023

UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation

The United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights, and five United Nations Special Rapporteurs have written to Unilever Plc, expressing their deep concern about the lack of access to justice and an effective remedy provided by Unilever to a group of (former) Unilever workers who were brutally assaulted on a Unilever tea plantation.

Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law

NewsTue Sep 26 2023

Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law

With the retail sector currently under scrutiny about its use of live facial recognition technology it is crucial that businesses understand how the equipment can be used lawfully.

B Corps: the future for law firms?

OpinionTue Sep 26 2023

B Corps: the future for law firms?

Dana Denis-Smith explains why she decided to pursue a B Corp certification for her firm.

SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose

SJ InterviewMon Sep 25 2023

SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose

Hannah Ambrose is an international arbitration partner at Herbert Smith Freehills. She talks to Solicitors Journal about her practice and the Law Commission's recent proposals to update the Arbitration Act 1996.

Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?

ForewordFri Sep 08 2023

Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?

Under the law, should your right to express your opinion – be it on politics, the environment, abortion, or anything else – trump my right to go about my business unhindered, whether or not I happen to agree with your opinion?