Associate Michelmores LLP

Out with the old, in with the new

Out with the old, in with the new

Working remotely now feels normal for Pippa Allsop, but her main difficulty has been a human issue not technological

As I prepared for my nth remote hearing recently – balancing my laptop on an assortment of large books and boxes so that the other hearing participants could look at my face as opposed to up the nose – I suddenly wondered when '¨this absolutely bonkers situation had started to feel oddly normal. 

As a profession, we have adjusted rather well to the requirements of remote working over the past four months; though certainly not seamlessly. But I had not anticipated that this way of working would become so familiar so quickly. I had not envisaged the slightly odd feeling I experienced when I physically attended my first hybrid hearing in an actual court. 

Somehow, doing what had previously been routine for years did not feel normal. I’m fully aware a large part of that was because the court was eerily quiet; and you risked being disinfected by an overly zealous court employee if you lingered too long in one place. However, I had not anticipated it feeling so bizarre after only a relatively short hiatus. 

There’s been considerable commentary speculating that the pandemic will undoubtedly cause a shift in attitudes towards working practices in our profession. Before covid-19, employers and employees were already becoming more mindful of the need to move towards flexible working and its tangible benefits. 

The pandemic has dispelled a great deal of the historic myths associated with flexible and or remote working. I think the most prevalent of these is that people are less productive when they are not in the office being ‘watched over’ by the powers that be. Leaving aside any concerns about the apparent lack of trust in adults to do their jobs without being guarded, we know in our profession that we have to account for every unit of our day. 

So it’s a profession in which you might assume that the ‘remote working = skiving off’ myth was not prevalent – but it is. Lockdown has undoubtedly helped to smash a hole through this largely unfounded theory and it’s my hope that it continues once we’re out on the other side. 

Another issue borne from lack of trust was that the technology would not support widespread long-term remote working. Whether on an individual day-to-day basis or in terms of interacting with clients and conferences and court hearings virtually, it’s safe to say there was an understandable concern that the road would be a bumpy and possibly unnavigable one. 

I can’t say I have not faced technology-related challenges, but my primary difficulty has been a human issue as opposed to technological. The biggest struggle to overcome has been client interaction, particularly when dealing with emotionally fraught private issues.

There are nuances of human interaction which are unavoidably lost – even over superfast broadband – and I have had to work hard at identifying how to compensate for this so that my clients feel as supported as they would if we were sitting in the same room. 

The other downside to my dining table being my office is that my office is my dining table. The most pleasant part about home working has been the flexibility it affords; but it has blurred the lines for me even further between work and home. I initially found myself working much longer hours and dipping into emails when I had finished for the day, unable to switch off. 

I have not perfected this yet, but this slippery slope has led me to invoke a greater degree of self-discipline when it comes to really switching off for the evening. 

My hope is that we shall emerge from this with some positive new working practices and attitudes and, equally, that we can identify what is not good for us as a profession. 

I hope we will receive encouragement from employers to identify and adopt what worked well and discard what has not. The fact that working flexibly and remotely now feels so normal will help to push us in the direction that is required.  

Pippa Allsop is an associate at Michelmores michelmores.com

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation

Tue Sep 26 2023

Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law

Tue Sep 26 2023

Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats

Mon Sep 25 2023

Legal Departments See Higher Matter Volumes but Flat or Declining Budgets: Thomson Reuters 2023 Legal Department Operations Index

Mon Sep 25 2023

More Than 200 Employers Named And Shamed For Failing To Pay National Minimum Wage

Mon Sep 25 2023

Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero

Fri Sep 22 2023

BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social media

Fri Sep 22 2023

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023
FeaturedNew report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka
Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka
A solicitor’s stance on EDI in the workplace
A solicitor’s stance on EDI in the workplace
New UK data protection bill may lighten the burden for business
New UK data protection bill may lighten the burden for business
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?