News EditorSolicitors Journal

Ofwat publishes measure to penalise companies for storm overflow failings

Ofwat publishes measure to penalise companies for storm overflow failings

The regulator will assume the overflow has spilled 100 times per year

Ofwat, the Water Services Regulation Authority, published on 14 June the measure that will be used for penalising companies that do not properly monitor their storm overflows.

In light of the responses to its recent consultation held in May on ‘Updating the storm overflows performance commitment definition for the 2024 price review (PR24)’ and further analysis, the regulator will apply the rationale that where a storm overflow has not been monitored, or the monitor has not been functioning correctly, it will be assumed that the overflow has spilled 100 times a year. According to the regulator, this figure is around four times the current average and double what Ofwat consulted on, and as such should provide a strong incentive for companies to install and maintain their monitors correctly. 

In order to combat the problem of sewage being inappropriately discharged into the environment, all wastewater companies will have set targets for reducing the average number of spills from storm overflows?and companies will be penalised by Ofwat where they do not meet those targets. The storm overflows targets for each company will form part of Ofwat’s price review for 2025 to 2030. The new measures taken by the regulator aim to deliver on the UK government’s Storm Overflows Discharge Reduction Plan and the Welsh Government’s Storm Overflows Action Plan.

Commenting on the development, Chris Walters, Senior Director, Price Review at Ofwat said: “Companies need to monitor their use of storm overflows and reduce their use. Companies must now take account of Ofwat’s decision when preparing their business plans for submission to Ofwat in October 2023. We will continue to use all the powers we have to drive companies to get to grips with this issue.”

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation

Tue Sep 26 2023

Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law

Tue Sep 26 2023

Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats

Mon Sep 25 2023

Legal Departments See Higher Matter Volumes but Flat or Declining Budgets: Thomson Reuters 2023 Legal Department Operations Index

Mon Sep 25 2023

More Than 200 Employers Named And Shamed For Failing To Pay National Minimum Wage

Mon Sep 25 2023

Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero

Fri Sep 22 2023

BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social media

Fri Sep 22 2023

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023
FeaturedThe Pre-Action Protocol review final report – full steam ahead?
The Pre-Action Protocol review final report – full steam ahead?
New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka
Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka
A solicitor’s stance on EDI in the workplace
A solicitor’s stance on EDI in the workplace
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?