EditorSolicitors Journal

NUS issues High Court challenge over plans to scrap grants

NUS issues High Court challenge over plans to scrap grants

Sajid Javid 'fails to meet' union requests to provide detail of equality assessments

Judicial review proceedings have been issued against the government over its controversial plans to scrap maintenance grants for students.

The announcement marks the latest stage of action by the National Union of Students (NUS) following the chancellor's revelation during the 2015 Summer Budget that he was to abolish grants.

Last month the NUS sent a pre-action letter to Sajid Javid, the secretary of state for Business, Innovation, and Skills, asking him to consider the equality implications of his plans before further steps are taken to change the law.

The minister is under a legal duty to assess the equality impact of their planned changes, under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010.

Javid has, however, failed to provide detail of assessments undertaken so far, undertake a lawful equality assessment, or provide assurances he will reconsider the plans in the light of the analysis, according to the union.

The NUS has therefore issued judicial review proceedings in the High Court. The union is being represented by Salima Budhani and John Halford of Bindmans and Charlotte Kilroy of Doughty Street Chambers.

The organisation believes that if the plans go ahead, access to higher education will be irrevocably compromised, as the abolition of grants, along with other welfare cuts, will mean students from low socio-economic backgrounds will be hit the hardest.

The NUS believes black and ethnic minority students are likely to be the most affected.

The union has argued that converting grants to loans will mean the poorest students will graduate from university with the highest debt, which will increase by £12,500 to a total of £53,000.

Megan Dunn, the NUS's national president, explained that she was extremely disappointed their concerns about access to education had not been taken seriously by the government and that had led them with no choice but to issue judicial review proceedings.

'The government needs to sit up and start listening to what the students of this country are telling them - that this will damage our education system and the potential of future generations,' she said.

Last month, thousands of students across the country lobbied their MPs as part of our #CutTheCosts campaign to show we will not let the government scrap our grants without a fight.'

John van der Luit-Drummond is deputy editor for Solicitors Journal
john.vanderluit@solicitorsjournal.co.uk | @JvdLD

Latest News

Parents and carers to be given new employment protections

Fri May 26 2023

Committee finds plans to level up the country risk failure due to funding concerns

Fri May 26 2023

Government consults on enforcement mechanisms for animal health and welfare offences

Fri May 26 2023

Government expands legal aid eligibility

Thu May 25 2023

Council of Europe identifies serious concerns affecting minorities in the UK

Thu May 25 2023

ONS finds international migration to the UK hit new high in 2022

Thu May 25 2023

Government consults on plans to reduce reporting burdens on businesses

Wed May 24 2023

Committee report finds government not taking harms from alcohol seriously enough

Wed May 24 2023

Committee seeks views on the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Bill

Wed May 24 2023
A closer look at the trademark dispute between retail giants Lidl and Tesco
The UK maternity care crisis: £5bn in avoidable damages claims
Understanding Chinese underground banking and the risks
The building blocks for a successful collaborative culture
SJ Interview: James Fulforth
Long-awaited reports and controversial bills dominate