Matt Hutchings discusses the Supreme Court's interpretation of vulnerability in Hotak, Kanu and Johnson

On 13 May, in three appeals about priority need for the homeless (Hotak, Kanu, and Johnson [2015] UKSC 30), the Supreme Court overturned the test
used by local authorities for
16 years to decide whether a homeless person is ‘vulnerable’ and so in priority need of accommodation.

The court ruled that the correct comparison is with an ‘ordinary person’ so that the
test is ‘significantly more vulnerable’ than an ordinary person. It also gave short shrift to the argument that parliament had implicitly approved the previous case law by not legislating to reverse it.

The Supreme Court agreed t...

Jean Yves


This article is part of a subscription-based access, to continue reading, please contact your library