New laws alter Scotland's justice system

19 Sept 2025News

Scotland's criminal justice system faces risks after MSPs approved significant reforms, sparking concerns about miscarriages of justice

The Law Society of Scotland has raised alarms regarding the future of the criminal justice system following the Scottish Parliament's recent approval of the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill. A final vote this afternoon saw 71 MSPs in favour, 46 against, and one abstention, paving the way for the bill to receive Royal Assent before its implementation. The legislation introduces sweeping changes, including the removal of the "Not Proven" verdict, a requirement for a two-thirds majority of jury members to secure a conviction, the establishment of a new dedicated sexual offences court, automatic lifelong anonymity for victims of sexual offences, and the creation of a Victims and Witnesses Commissioner for Scotland.

Stuart Munro, Convener of the Law Society’s Criminal Law Committee, expressed his discontent by stating “We are disappointed our serious concerns are not reflected in the final legislation approved by MSPs, and apprehensive for the increased potential for miscarriages of justice as a result of changes not backed by research or experience elsewhere.” He further elaborated on the risks associated with the new measures, noting “The fundamental purpose of any criminal justice system is to convict the guilty and acquit the innocent. We’re moving from a system with a proven track record of achieving that outcome to one which is entirely untested and does not exist in any equivalent legal system anywhere in the world.”

Munro also highlighted the disparity in jury conviction standards, saying “Every legal system with a two-verdict system requires a unanimous or near unanimous jury to convict, whereas Scotland will now have a system where a person can be convicted despite five members of the jury having significant doubts about their guilt.” Despite these reservations, he acknowledged support for other vital components of the legislation, including the introduction of a Victims and Witnesses Commissioner and lifelong anonymity for victims of sexual offences.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|

Employment tribunal cases rising sharply

Recent Ministry of Justice figures reveal a significant increase in open Employment Tribunal cases and challenges faced by employers

SRA updates guidance for litigation supervision

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has enhanced its supervision guidelines to clarify litigation conduct after recent court rulings

Millions of fathers lack parental responsibility

Many fathers may be surprised to learn about their parental responsibility rights and how to secure them

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.

Griffiths v Essex County Council: EAT clarifies causation in discrimination remedy awards and sends pension loss back for recalculation

A single act of indirect disability discrimination can ground a full loss of earnings award, even where a later constructive dismissal claim was framed only...