LoginSubscribe Now
Follow Us
Sign up to our free newsletter
Solicitors Journal LogoInforming the legal profession since 1856

Find the knowledge you need from the SJ library of over 20,000 legal articles

Search now
Solicitors Journal Logo
  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports
  • AI Search
  • Digital Edition
  • Subscription Options
  • Advertise with Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • FAQ
    • Guide to Authors
Solicitors Journal

Informing the legal profession since 1856.

Follow us

Topics

  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports

About

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • FAQ
  • Guide to Authors

Subscribe

  • Subscription Options
  • Digital Edition
  • Free Newsletter

Editorial

editorial@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Subscriptions

subscriptions@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Advertising

Advertise with usadvertising@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

© 2026 Solicitors Journal in partnership with the International In-house Counsel Journal

ISSN 0038-1047  ·  Images: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors

Terms and ConditionsCookie PolicyPrivacy PolicyPLS Clear logoCopyright & permissions
Suzanne TownleySuzanne Townley

News Editor, Solicitors Journal

Legal profession reacts to appointment of new PM and justice secretary

26 Oct 2022|News|Add your comment
Share:
Legal profession reacts to appointment of new PM and justice secretary

By Suzanne Townley

The reaction has been mixed

The appointment of Rishi Sunak as prime minister has been broadly welcomed by the legal profession, while the re-appointment of Dominic Raab as justice secretary has met a mixed reception.

In his first speech as prime minister yesterday (25 October), Sunak acknowledged the country is facing a “profound economic crisis” due to the impact of the pandemic and the war in Ukraine. He vowed to “place economic stability and confidence at the heart of this government’s agenda”. 

Sunak promised: “A stronger NHS. Better schools. Safer streets. Control of our borders. Protecting our environment. Supporting our armed forces. Levelling up and building an economy that embraces the opportunities of Brexit, where businesses invest, innovate, and create jobs.”

However, there was no mention of the justice system. The Law Society said the justice system “must be a key priority” for the new PM.

“Our justice system is beset by backlogs and plagued by delays, causing anger and anguish to any who use our courts. Our crumbling court estate is a visual reminder of the damage caused by years of chronic underfunding,” said Law Society president, Lubna Shuja.

Shuja called on the new PM to “fix” the “chronically underfunded” justice system and asked him to commit to implementation of the full 15 per cent criminal legal aid rate increase – the minimum recommended by Lord Bellamy.

The Law Society president said the Civil Legal Aid Review – on pause since 2018 – must be launched “urgently” to ensure timely access to justice for all.

“Solicitors are feeling the squeeze of the increasing cost of doing business. The new Prime Minister must take action to ensure that our professional services sector can not only survive but thrive, and drive growth in our economy,” said Shuja.

“Only investment across the entire system will repair the damage. It is essential that Sunak’s government, as an absolute minimum, maintains justice spending and addresses the funding gap which is crushing the system.

Jan Matthews, managing partner at Reeds Solicitors, welcomed Sunak’s appointment: “We welcome the elevation of Rishi Sunak to the position Prime Minister, and hope that this now marks the end of turmoil within our Government for the rest of their parliamentary term”. 

He said: “Whilst we appreciate that the country’s economic prospects are currently not looking good, the provision of criminal legal aid defence services remain in the same dire circumstances so well described by Sir Bellamy’s report and cannot be ignored if the criminal justice system is to continue to operate in any meaningful way. 

“We therefore hope that the government will continue to pay some small attention to the outcome of the criminal legal aid review due in November, taking into consideration the views of contract holders and the Law Society”. 

However, Matthews was disappointed with Raab’s re-appointment as justice secretary: “Given Dominic Raab's previous refusal to engage with the legal profession concerning the implementation of the Bellamy report, his appointment is concerning when it is clear that firms need at least the full minimum recommended increase in legal aid fees in order to remain sustainable.

“We hope that Mr Sunak's premiership will mean that there is a change of approach across all of Government, including the Ministry of Justice.” 

Julian Hayes, senior partner at Berris Law, had similar misgivings: “Dominic Raab’s return as Justice Secretary is unfortunate, and I fear does not bode well for the profession and in particular the courts and criminal justice system.

“He had failed to engage with professionals to resolve the crisis. Perhaps it reflects the ‘difficult decisions’ that the PM and Chancellor have referred to when it comes to considering cuts in public services?

“Regrettably, I do not consider that we are in good or reliable hands with this latest version of a conservative government. I hope that I am wrong and that Mr. Raab has learnt lessons from his first tenure in that role. He must work with the profession to ensure the crisis is averted.”

However, Professor Chris Bones, chair of CILEX, was more optimistic, and said CILEX looked forward to “continuing the positive and constructive relationship we built when he was last in office”.

“We hope that he will bring some continuity to the justice system and will complete the vital work that he previously commenced to secure change that will improve the social mobility and diversity across the legal profession,” he added.

Bones said it was “crucial” there were no further delays to reforms.

Related Topics

  • Solicitors

Comments

Latest Articles

The appointment of Rishi Sunak as prime minister has been broadly welcomed by the legal profession, while the re-appointment of Dominic Raab as justice secretary has met a mixed reception.

In his first speech as prime minister yesterday (25 October), Sunak acknowledged the country is facing a “profound economic crisis” due to the impact of the pandemic and the war in Ukraine. He vowed to “place economic stability and confidence at the heart of this government’s agenda”. 

Sunak promised: “A stronger NHS. Better schools. Safer streets. Control of our borders. Protecting our environment. Supporting our armed forces. Levelling up and building an economy that embraces the opportunities of Brexit, where businesses invest, innovate, and create jobs.”

However, there was no mention of the justice system. The Law Society said the justice system “must be a key priority” for the new PM.

“Our justice system is beset by backlogs and plagued by delays, causing anger and anguish to any who use our courts. Our crumbling court estate is a visual reminder of the damage caused by years of chronic underfunding,” said Law Society president, Lubna Shuja.

Shuja called on the new PM to “fix” the “chronically underfunded” justice system and asked him to commit to implementation of the full 15 per cent criminal legal aid rate increase – the minimum recommended by Lord Bellamy.

The Law Society president said the Civil Legal Aid Review – on pause since 2018 – must be launched “urgently” to ensure timely access to justice for all.

“Solicitors are feeling the squeeze of the increasing cost of doing business. The new Prime Minister must take action to ensure that our professional services sector can not only survive but thrive, and drive growth in our economy,” said Shuja.

“Only investment across the entire system will repair the damage. It is essential that Sunak’s government, as an absolute minimum, maintains justice spending and addresses the funding gap which is crushing the system.

Jan Matthews, managing partner at Reeds Solicitors, welcomed Sunak’s appointment: “We welcome the elevation of Rishi Sunak to the position Prime Minister, and hope that this now marks the end of turmoil within our Government for the rest of their parliamentary term”. 

He said: “Whilst we appreciate that the country’s economic prospects are currently not looking good, the provision of criminal legal aid defence services remain in the same dire circumstances so well described by Sir Bellamy’s report and cannot be ignored if the criminal justice system is to continue to operate in any meaningful way. 

“We therefore hope that the government will continue to pay some small attention to the outcome of the criminal legal aid review due in November, taking into consideration the views of contract holders and the Law Society”. 

However, Matthews was disappointed with Raab’s re-appointment as justice secretary: “Given Dominic Raab's previous refusal to engage with the legal profession concerning the implementation of the Bellamy report, his appointment is concerning when it is clear that firms need at least the full minimum recommended increase in legal aid fees in order to remain sustainable.

“We hope that Mr Sunak's premiership will mean that there is a change of approach across all of Government, including the Ministry of Justice.” 

Julian Hayes, senior partner at Berris Law, had similar misgivings: “Dominic Raab’s return as Justice Secretary is unfortunate, and I fear does not bode well for the profession and in particular the courts and criminal justice system.

“He had failed to engage with professionals to resolve the crisis. Perhaps it reflects the ‘difficult decisions’ that the PM and Chancellor have referred to when it comes to considering cuts in public services?

“Regrettably, I do not consider that we are in good or reliable hands with this latest version of a conservative government. I hope that I am wrong and that Mr. Raab has learnt lessons from his first tenure in that role. He must work with the profession to ensure the crisis is averted.”

However, Professor Chris Bones, chair of CILEX, was more optimistic, and said CILEX looked forward to “continuing the positive and constructive relationship we built when he was last in office”.

“We hope that he will bring some continuity to the justice system and will complete the vital work that he previously commenced to secure change that will improve the social mobility and diversity across the legal profession,” he added.

Bones said it was “crucial” there were no further delays to reforms.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
Protecting your face: trade marks in the AI age
Solicitors Journal

Protecting your face: trade marks in the AI age

As AI makes convincing deepfakes effortless, public figures are turning to trade mark law to protect their valuable image
Practice Notes30 Jun 2026
UK litigation funding sector in crisis
Solicitors Journal

UK litigation funding sector in crisis

A recent report reveals that the UK's litigation funding sector is lagging behind global competitors due to government inaction
News30 Jun 2026
Domestic killers will face longer sentences
Solicitors Journal

Domestic killers will face longer sentences

A new legal change will see domestic murderers face a 25-year sentencing starting point for their crimes
News30 Jun 2026
Parole Board provides new resources for victims
Solicitors Journal

Parole Board provides new resources for victims

The Parole Board has launched a video and leaflet to assist victims navigating the parole process.
News30 Jun 2026
Dickinson v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals: Pabrinex failure causes Wernicke's encephalopathy and profound functional disorder, rules High Court
Solicitors Journal

Dickinson v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals: Pabrinex failure causes Wernicke's encephalopathy and profound functional disorder, rules High Court

NHS trust's admitted failure to administer Vitamin B1 to an alcoholic patient leads to lifelong disability and 24-hour care needs.
Court Report30 Jun 2026
CP Holdings v Assicurazioni Generali: broker's failure to press for conformity term proves fatal to €160m Covid-19 BI claim
Solicitors Journal

CP Holdings v Assicurazioni Generali: broker's failure to press for conformity term proves fatal to €160m Covid-19 BI claim

A confirmed "willingness in principle" to agree a conformity clause is not the same as agreeing one, rules the Commercial Court.
Court Report30 Jun 2026
Rowntree v Performing Right Society: Court of Appeal dismisses Blur drummer's black box royalties class action
Solicitors Journal

Rowntree v Performing Right Society: Court of Appeal dismisses Blur drummer's black box royalties class action

Pro rata distribution of unmatched music royalties is not an abuse of dominance without a viable counterfactual, rules Court of Appeal.
Court Report29 Jun 2026
City Outdoor Media v Secretary of State: Court of Appeal confirms scope of inquiry for site-wide advertising discontinuance notices
Solicitors Journal

City Outdoor Media v Secretary of State: Court of Appeal confirms scope of inquiry for site-wide advertising discontinuance notices

Inspector need not assess every class of deemed consent when upholding a site-wide discontinuance notice, Court of Appeal rules.
Court Report29 Jun 2026
Kensington Mortgage Company v Price: mortgagee in possession must register as Welsh landlord before serving possession notice
Solicitors Journal

Kensington Mortgage Company v Price: mortgagee in possession must register as Welsh landlord before serving possession notice

High Court rules that a mortgagee cannot separate its status under Welsh housing legislation to avoid landlord registration requirements.
Court Report29 Jun 2026
Weis v Greater Manchester Combined Authority: Court of Appeal defines CAT's review powers in landmark Subsidy Control Act ruling
Solicitors Journal

Weis v Greater Manchester Combined Authority: Court of Appeal defines CAT's review powers in landmark Subsidy Control Act ruling

First Court of Appeal decision under the 2022 Act confirms the CAT determines for itself whether a subsidy exists.
Court Report29 Jun 2026
Bay Farm Power v Prescott: Upper Tribunal cuts anaerobic digester rateable values and rejects sector-wide tone argument
Solicitors Journal

Bay Farm Power v Prescott: Upper Tribunal cuts anaerobic digester rateable values and rejects sector-wide tone argument

Standard 10% risk uplift held insufficient for AD plants as Tribunal finds working capital omission undermines primary valuations.
Court Report29 Jun 2026
Privatbank v Kolomoisky: ring-fenced funds released to bank on dismissal of appeal, rules High Court
Solicitors Journal

Privatbank v Kolomoisky: ring-fenced funds released to bank on dismissal of appeal, rules High Court

Costs incurred but unpaid before the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal cannot be drawn from ring-fenced accounts.
Court Report29 Jun 2026
Young v Royal Mail Group: EAT dismisses trade union protection appeal over WhatsApp threat
Solicitors Journal

Young v Royal Mail Group: EAT dismisses trade union protection appeal over WhatsApp threat

WhatsApp posts during CWU industrial dispute fell outside statutory protection, rules Employment Appeal Tribunal.
Court Report29 Jun 2026
SJ Interview: Chris Spelman
Solicitors Journal

SJ Interview: Chris Spelman

Chris Spelman is a partner in DWF's London dispute resolution team, specialising in financial services litigation and investigations, whistleblowing matters, and class action, securities and...
Interview1 Jun 2026
When the rules can't keep up
Solicitors Journal

When the rules can't keep up

From Westminster to the courts, the rules are being written faster than they can settle
Foreword1 Jun 2026