Sign up to our free newsletter
Follow Us
LoginSubscribe Now
Solicitors Journal LogoInforming the legal profession since 1856
Solicitors Journal Logo
  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports
  • AI Search
  • Digital Edition
  • Subscription Options
  • Advertise with Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • FAQ
    • Guide to Authors
Solicitors Journal

Informing the legal profession since 1856.

Follow us

Topics

  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports

About

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • FAQ
  • Guide to Authors

Subscribe

  • Subscription Options
  • Digital Edition
  • Free Newsletter

Editorial

editorial@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Subscriptions

subscriptions@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Advertising

Advertise with usadvertising@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

© 2026 Solicitors Journal in partnership with the International In-house Counsel Journal | ISSN 0038-1047 | Images: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors

Terms and ConditionsCookie PolicyPrivacy PolicyPLS Clear logoCopyright & permissions
Law News Law News

LawtechUK bolsters panel

12 Jul 2023News
Share:
LawtechUK bolsters panel

By Law News

The UK's Ministry of Justice has announced the appointment of five new members to the panel of LawtechUK, an industry-led, government-supported initiative to develop the use of technology in the legal sector

Chaired by Christina Blacklaws, former president of the Law Society, the panel acts as an advisory board to the LawtechUK programme. Panel members include leaders from the public and private sectors who are well versed in the law and technology sector.

According to a Ministry of Justice press release, the changes reflect the transition to the second phase of LawtechUK, which is being taken forwards by start-up incubator CodeBase and Legal Geek, which runs events and programmes to connect legal businesses and the technology sector.

The press release says: "The panel will continue to support the LawtechUK programme, helping ensure its success and supporting Codebase and Legal Geek to drive the development and use of technology in the legal sector. This will also accelerate the growth of the UK’s internationally-recognised lawtech sector."

The new members are:

  • Maya Markovich – executive director of Justice Technology Association
  • Mimi Zou – co-founder of Deriskly and professor of commercial law, University of Exeter
  • Isabel Parker – partner at Deloitte Legal
  • Stephen Browning – challenge director for next generation services at UK Research and Innovation
  • Sophia Adams Bhatti – global head of purpose and impact, Simmons & Simmons.

Rosemary Martin, who has been a member of the panel for over four years, will be stepping down.

Blacklaws said: "I am delighted and excited to welcome our talented new colleagues to the LawtechUK panel. This is an incredibly exciting time as the industry explores the possibilities and consequences of utilising generative AI whilst trying to address issues of unmet legal need in this country. The LawtechUK panel will be at the forefront of this work and our new members will help to drive forward innovation in the legal sector."

Justice Minister Mike Freer said: "LawtechUK plays a central role in nurturing new cutting-edge innovation, and supporting the UK’s place as a world leader in legal services and expertise. I welcome this new panel of established and outstanding individuals whose collective expertise will bring tremendous value to the work of the programme well into the future.

The objectives for LawtechUK’s second phase will build on work delivered so far, in order to increase innovation and the adoption of lawtech in the delivery of UK legal services. It also aims to support the growth of the lawtech sector in the UK and enable English and Welsh law and the UK’s jurisdictions to become the foundation for emerging technologies, by supporting and promoting the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce’s work.

Related Topics

  • The Bar
  • Solicitors

Latest Articles

Chaired by Christina Blacklaws, former president of the Law Society, the panel acts as an advisory board to the LawtechUK programme. Panel members include leaders from the public and private sectors who are well versed in the law and technology sector.

According to a Ministry of Justice press release, the changes reflect the transition to the second phase of LawtechUK, which is being taken forwards by start-up incubator CodeBase and Legal Geek, which runs events and programmes to connect legal businesses and the technology sector.

The press release says: "The panel will continue to support the LawtechUK programme, helping ensure its success and supporting Codebase and Legal Geek to drive the development and use of technology in the legal sector. This will also accelerate the growth of the UK’s internationally-recognised lawtech sector."

The new members are:

  • Maya Markovich – executive director of Justice Technology Association
  • Mimi Zou – co-founder of Deriskly and professor of commercial law, University of Exeter
  • Isabel Parker – partner at Deloitte Legal
  • Stephen Browning – challenge director for next generation services at UK Research and Innovation
  • Sophia Adams Bhatti – global head of purpose and impact, Simmons & Simmons.

Rosemary Martin, who has been a member of the panel for over four years, will be stepping down.

Blacklaws said: "I am delighted and excited to welcome our talented new colleagues to the LawtechUK panel. This is an incredibly exciting time as the industry explores the possibilities and consequences of utilising generative AI whilst trying to address issues of unmet legal need in this country. The LawtechUK panel will be at the forefront of this work and our new members will help to drive forward innovation in the legal sector."

Justice Minister Mike Freer said: "LawtechUK plays a central role in nurturing new cutting-edge innovation, and supporting the UK’s place as a world leader in legal services and expertise. I welcome this new panel of established and outstanding individuals whose collective expertise will bring tremendous value to the work of the programme well into the future.

The objectives for LawtechUK’s second phase will build on work delivered so far, in order to increase innovation and the adoption of lawtech in the delivery of UK legal services. It also aims to support the growth of the lawtech sector in the UK and enable English and Welsh law and the UK’s jurisdictions to become the foundation for emerging technologies, by supporting and promoting the UK Jurisdiction Taskforce’s work.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
UK to raise social media age limit
Solicitors Journal

UK to raise social media age limit

The UK plans to increase the minimum age for social media access to 16, following Australia's lead addressing online safety for children
News15 Jun 2026
SPP urges HMRC to reconsider pension tax
Solicitors Journal

SPP urges HMRC to reconsider pension tax

The Society of Pension Professionals has called on HMRC to address concerns over inheritance tax on pensions to avoid confusion for families affected by bereavement
News15 Jun 2026
Progress in cleaning up Companies House
Solicitors Journal

Progress in cleaning up Companies House

A new report highlights ongoing improvements to the Companies House register aimed at tackling economic crime
News15 Jun 2026
Court of Appeal overturns Palestine Action proscription ruling in Home Secretary v Ammori
Solicitors Journal

Court of Appeal overturns Palestine Action proscription ruling in Home Secretary v Ammori

Court of Appeal restores Palestine Action's proscription, recalibrating deference owed to the Home Secretary on national security.
Court Report15 Jun 2026
Mirza v Lewin: High Court limits scope of stay pending late appeal bid
Solicitors Journal

Mirza v Lewin: High Court limits scope of stay pending late appeal bid

A £1.3m costs order stands, but the court grants a narrow window for an appeal on procedural fairness grounds.
Court Report15 Jun 2026
XX v YY: EAT rules duress cannot be ignored when assessing gross misconduct
Solicitors Journal

XX v YY: EAT rules duress cannot be ignored when assessing gross misconduct

A teacher dismissed over a message sent under duress wins on wrongful dismissal as the EAT revisits repudiatory breach.
Court Report15 Jun 2026
Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no
Solicitors Journal

Re Poundstretcher: cross-class cramdown survives even when six landlord classes say no

The Chancery Division sanctions Poundstretcher's restructuring plan despite six dissenting landlord classes, applying the Adler and Petrofac framework.
Court Report12 Jun 2026
Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes
Solicitors Journal

Ponsford v Sali: a property partnership's messy divorce shows why documentation wins partnership disputes

The Chancery Division takes a pragmatic, evidence based approach to untangling a property partnership built on undocumented cash dealings.
Court Report12 Jun 2026
North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story
Solicitors Journal

North Somerset District Council v Secretary of State: failing the flood sequential test is not the end of the story

The Planning Court confirms that a failed flood risk sequential test still gets weighed in the planning balance, not treated as an automatic refusal.
Court Report12 Jun 2026
Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed
Solicitors Journal

Thomas Armstrong (Aggregates) v Housing Secretary: when landfill buries a quarry's right to be reviewed

The Planning Court applies Pilkington and Hillside to find a 1954 quarry permission can no longer be revived under the ROMP regime.
Court Report12 Jun 2026
Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence
Solicitors Journal

Clerkenwell Lifestyle v HG Construction: be careful what you call "agreed" in extension of time correspondence

The TCC enforces a £955,943 adjudication award after rejecting a contractor's late attempt to recast email exchanges as a binding settlement.
Court Report12 Jun 2026
Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass
Solicitors Journal

Ward v Donnellan: when both sides lie, "no order for costs" is not a free pass

The Court of Appeal overturns a no order for costs ruling, finding a judge let a dishonest claimant off too lightly.
Court Report12 Jun 2026
London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case
Solicitors Journal

London Borough of Camden v BW: when a single missing fact can decide a capacity case

The Court of Protection finds an expert's failure to explore one consequence, losing a placement, was enough to undermine his capacity assessment.
Court Report12 Jun 2026
SJ Interview: Paul Marco
Solicitors Journal

SJ Interview: Paul Marco

Paul Marco, Managing Partner of Trowers & Hamlins, speaks to Solicitors Journal
Interview26 May 2026
When the rules can't keep up
Solicitors Journal

When the rules can't keep up

From Westminster to the courts, the rules are being written faster than they can settle
Foreword1 Jun 2026