News EditorSolicitors Journal

Law Society urges practitioners to complete survey on proposed probate fees hike

Law Society urges practitioners to complete survey on proposed probate fees hike

The Law Society's survey closes at the end of August, ahead of the closure of the MOJ's consultation in September

The Law Society has today (16 August) urged probate practitioners to feed into its consultation response to the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) proposed fees hike for probate applications. 

Fees for professional users are currently £155 and £215 for non-professional users. However, the MOJ has proposed a single fee of £273 be introduced for all users. 

Law Society president, I. Stephanie Boyce, said: “We want to ensure that the changes won’t affect the viability of firms doing probate work or act as a barrier to vulnerable people who need to use this service. 

“This survey is a way for us to hear your views on the proposals, as well as other improvements probate solicitors would like to see in the probate service in England.

“The probate service has had continued and significant delays during the pandemic, with some users facing delays of 12 to 14 weeks in 2020 when they were applying for probate grants of letters of administration. 

“This is unacceptable, the service must be timely and allow executors to settle a loved one’s estate. The online service was specifically designed to streamline the process and the UK government must ensure the system is working efficiently. 

“We would value input from probate practitioners who are using this service and views on how delays have affected their clients.”    

Speaking to the Solicitors Journal last month, following the announcement of the fees hike, partner and head of private capital at DWF's Manchester office, Christopher Noel, said: “I agree with the Law Society that it seems hard to justify an increase in probate fees, particularly in the context of long delays and inconsistent service levels over these long last few months”.

Noel said he had some sympathy with the Probate Registry who had been forced to work from home “during a difficult and unprecedented time” and said he was sure that had caused “some logistical and practical difficulties in issuing grants”.

He added: “However, there is also a push to move more and more applications online and to centralise administration of grants, and with that in mind it again seems strange to raise fees when costs are (or should be) being cut”.

Noel also commented on the distinction between the fees paid by current users: “The current fees are lower for professional users, and presumably this has always been on the basis that a professional user will be easier, less time-consuming and therefore cheaper to deal with than a non-professional user, because the professional user is familiar with the process.  

“The consultation document suggests that the costs of processing applications from the two groups is now broadly equivalent, and on that basis perhaps the two fees should be simplified into one, particularly as ultimately the estate pays in any event.”

The Law Society’s survey closes on Friday 27 August and it will respond in full to the consultation in September. 

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation

Tue Sep 26 2023

Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law

Tue Sep 26 2023

Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats

Mon Sep 25 2023

Legal Departments See Higher Matter Volumes but Flat or Declining Budgets: Thomson Reuters 2023 Legal Department Operations Index

Mon Sep 25 2023

More Than 200 Employers Named And Shamed For Failing To Pay National Minimum Wage

Mon Sep 25 2023

Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero

Fri Sep 22 2023

BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social media

Fri Sep 22 2023

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023
FeaturedThe Pre-Action Protocol review final report – full steam ahead?
The Pre-Action Protocol review final report – full steam ahead?
New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka
Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka
A solicitor’s stance on EDI in the workplace
A solicitor’s stance on EDI in the workplace
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?