News EditorSolicitors Journal

Law Society: covid-19 restrictions may need to remain in courts

Law Society: covid-19 restrictions may need to remain in courts

Society president, I. Stephanie Boyce, has called for long-term investment to bolster the 'threadbare' justice system and beat covid backlogs

The Law Society of England and Wales (Law Society) has warned some covid-19 restrictions may need to be retained in courts to allow them to run safely and efficiently, despite most remaining restrictions being set to be lifted on Monday (19 July). 

Law Society president, I. Stephanie Boyce, said: “We are pleased to see that things are getting closer to normal with widespread vaccination allowing for restrictions imposed during the pandemic to be lifted.

“The removal of restrictions including social distancing should allow for the courts to run closer to capacity. However, given the backdrop of rising covid infection rates, many court users will have concerns about a return to ‘normal’.

She said a “wide spectrum” of views about ongoing risks need to be considered, in the context of some individuals being more vulnerable than others. “Jurors, witnesses and professional court users need to be reassured that they will remain safe”.

She also raised practical issues: “… if members of staff are required to self-isolate, or if a jury is lost mid-trial because of a covid contact – the removal of restrictions could become counterproductive to efforts to beat the backlogs. It is therefore likely to be important to retain some restrictions in courts, even if the government removes nationwide legal restrictions.

Boyce stressed the importance of keeping “channels of communication open” so court users’ concerns can be addressed and to “find that right balance between making appropriate use of the new flexibility and keeping people assured of their safety.”

In the week ending 23 May, there are more than 57,000 outstanding Crown Court cases and more than 450,000 in the magistrates’ courts.

Boyce commented: “With some trials being listed for 2023 it’s clear the pandemic has compounded decades of underfunding and cuts in the criminal courts.

“Even as we get closer to ‘normal’, there is a clear need for sustained long-term investment into our threadbare justice system to beat the backlogs and ensure timely access to justice for all”.

Referring to a speech given by the lord chief justice to HM Judges at Mansion House on 7 July, she said: “It is heartening to see the lord chief justice recognise this need for sustained funding.

“The removal of restrictions should help increase court capacity, but this is not the only major constraint on tackling the backlogs. There are also challenges in finding enough part-time judges, and enough litigators and advocates to handle the volume of cases in the system.”

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Axiom Ince collapses: Police investigation begins

Tue Oct 03 2023

Barrister Carly Walters ordered to be disbarred

Tue Oct 03 2023

Fines to increase for employers without robust employment screening

Mon Oct 02 2023

IBA publishes for the first time a legal agenda identifying profession’s most pressing concerns

Mon Oct 02 2023

Black History Month: Legal profession celebrates influential Black women lawyers

Mon Oct 02 2023

The Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid

Fri Sep 29 2023

Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce

Fri Sep 29 2023

Families continue to be victims of a broken justice system

Fri Sep 29 2023

Call for compensation scheme extension to help more abuse survivors

Fri Sep 29 2023
FeaturedChris Packham legal action over Rishi Sunak's announcement
Chris Packham legal action over Rishi Sunak's announcement
Why civil mediation is the smarter choice than pressing for your day in court
Why civil mediation is the smarter choice than pressing for your day in court
SRA now managing the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
SRA now managing the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
Law Society concerned over fixed recoverable costs rollout
Law Society concerned over fixed recoverable costs rollout
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?