EditorSolicitors Journal

Lack of transparency in legal fees on divorce, report says

Lack of transparency in legal fees on divorce, report says

Solicitors’ fees are becoming less transparent, according to a survey which revealed young people are increasingly borrowing money to fund divorces

Divorce solicitors’ fees are becoming less transparent, according to a survey which revealed young people are increasingly borrowing money from family and friends to fund divorces.

A report from financing provider Ampla Finance Legal followed a YouGov survey which explored issues such as how well clients feel they are being served by their solicitors and how difficult it can be to finance a divorce.

A nationally representative sample of 1,005 divorced UK adults were surveyed.

Nigel Shepherd, strategic adviser at Ampla Finance and a consultant at Mills & Reeve, said in his foreword to the report that familiar themes emerged.

“These include the importance of the professional relationship between family law clients and their solicitors (including the continued relevance of face-to-face communications in an increasingly digital age) and the need for transparency on costs”, he said.

The report revealed that the issue of solicitors’ fees topped the list of concerns around improving client service; and that more than in any other region “fees were the biggest concern for respondents from London”.

Transparency was a major issue with people under 55 more likely to say their divorce was more expensive than initially quoted compared to the older age group.

The report concluded that clarity around fees is becoming more opaque and that “the younger generation is pursuing increasingly precarious methods of financing their divorces”.

Financing a divorce was a significant issue for many respondents.

The report found 27% of people aged 55 plus sold, mortgaged or remortgaged their property to fund their divorce.

That figure dropped to 13% for younger people, reflecting the reality that they are far less likely to own their own property and needed to resort to alternative sources.

42% of people under 55 said they had to borrow money from friends and/or family to finance their divorce (dropping to 12% for those aged 55 or over); and 17% resorted to selling their belongings.

A quarter of the younger age group relied on a credit card to fund their divorce.

“Credit cards in particular can expose individuals to the risk of snowballing debt,” the report observed.

Alexie Bonavia, associate at Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, commented: “Divorce is rarely smooth and no matter how ‘grown-up’ the parties, the reality is that there will inevitably be a number of acrimonious issues to deal with.

“It is a solicitor's duty to provide as much certainty as possible when quoting initial costs, anticipating the potential problems that may arise.”

She observed that younger couples increasingly require “family financial assistance and those who cannot call upon this luxury are now taking on the DIY divorce process themselves with outside professional guidance”.

“In some cases”, she said, “couples will find that they have no alternative but to resort to the court for a definitive resolution and incur substantial legal costs in the process”.

Firms need to reassess how they communicate information around their fees, the reports suggests.

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation

Tue Sep 26 2023

Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law

Tue Sep 26 2023

Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats

Mon Sep 25 2023

Legal Departments See Higher Matter Volumes but Flat or Declining Budgets: Thomson Reuters 2023 Legal Department Operations Index

Mon Sep 25 2023

More Than 200 Employers Named And Shamed For Failing To Pay National Minimum Wage

Mon Sep 25 2023

Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero

Fri Sep 22 2023

BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social media

Fri Sep 22 2023

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023
FeaturedThe Pre-Action Protocol review final report – full steam ahead?
The Pre-Action Protocol review final report – full steam ahead?
New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka
Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka
A solicitor’s stance on EDI in the workplace
A solicitor’s stance on EDI in the workplace
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?