Deputy EditorSolicitors Journal

Labour pledges to reverse legal aid cuts

Labour pledges to reverse legal aid cuts

Labour has extended its pledge to reverse the Conservatives’ cuts to legal aid within the first 100 days if it is voted into government, according to shadow justice secretary Richard Burgon.

Labour has extended its pledge to reverse the Conservatives’ cuts to legal aid within the first 100 days if it is voted into government, according to shadow justice secretary Richard Burgon.

Labour had previously committed to reversing Tory cuts on legal aid for housing cases, family law and welfare benefit appeals, but Burgon (pictured) told the Labour party conference this week that this will now be extended to Early Legal Help.

This would restore legal aid for immigration cases, employment, debt, and mental health cases.

Early Legal Help is the legal support that people receive before a lawyer represents them in the courts. It is the kind of advice, Burgon said, that many desperately need when faced with everyday problems such as flawed benefits decisions or rogue landlords.

He said a lack of early legal advice often creates extra costs for the taxpayer as cases go to court which could have been resolved earlier or spiral into costly social problems as people unnecessarily lose their homes or jobs.

The United Nations Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights has said that cuts in legal aid meant many could no longer afford “to challenge benefit denials or reductions and are thus effectively deprived of their human right to a remedy.”

Burgon said: “Tory cuts to legal advice mean hundreds of thousands of people are unable to defend their hard-won rights. When that happens, equality before the law is a fiction, and without these protections people’s lives can often be torn apart.”

He also told the conference that Labour will order a comprehensive review of the Legal Aid Agency if it wins power.

He said the review would be “fully independent” and chaired by Steve Hynes, former director of Legal Action Group. A working party would be established to make recommendations on how to “properly and effectively administer” legal aid. 

Two years ago, in its Right to Justice report, the Bach Commission – established by Labour peer Lord Bach – called for the agency to be replaced with a body that was independent of the government.

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation

Tue Sep 26 2023

Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law

Tue Sep 26 2023

Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats

Mon Sep 25 2023

Legal Departments See Higher Matter Volumes but Flat or Declining Budgets: Thomson Reuters 2023 Legal Department Operations Index

Mon Sep 25 2023

More Than 200 Employers Named And Shamed For Failing To Pay National Minimum Wage

Mon Sep 25 2023

Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero

Fri Sep 22 2023

BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social media

Fri Sep 22 2023

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023
FeaturedThe Pre-Action Protocol review final report – full steam ahead?
The Pre-Action Protocol review final report – full steam ahead?
New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka
Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka
A solicitor’s stance on EDI in the workplace
A solicitor’s stance on EDI in the workplace
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?