News EditorSolicitors Journal

Judges to retire at 75 to reflect social change and support courts in crisis

Judges to retire at 75 to reflect social change and support courts in crisis

Mandatory retirement age of judges, magistrates and coroners to increase from 70 to 75

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has today announced that the judicial mandatory retirement age will increase from 70 to 75 for judges, magistrates and coroners.

The change comes after the conclusion of the consultation on Judicial Mandatory Retirement Age (MRA) in October 2020. The announcement signals the first change in MRA for 27 years, needed to ‘reflect increases in life expectancy, societal changes and the demands on our courts and tribunals’. 

The MoJ stated that most responses to the consultation were in favour of raising the MRA, though views differed on whether the MRA should be 72 or 75. However, it said that increasing the MRA give judicial officeholders greater flexibility in both when they apply and when to retire. 

The MoJ also said it wished to attract ‘a greater number of talented and diverse applicants’. The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Robert Buckland QC, said: “… mandatory retirement age promotes the growth of diversity across judicial office holders as by ensuring that regular recruitment can be planned to maintain a steady flow of new appointments”. 

It has been widely reported that the courts have been under strain as a result of the pandemic, and the retention of experienced judicial office holders will also help support the judicial system at this particularly challenging time.

The Lord Chancellor commented: “As Lord Chancellor, I have a duty to provide resources for the effective operation of our courts and tribunals. It is therefore important that the policies which may impact upon the appointment and retention of judicial office holders are reviewed to ensure that they are able to meet our changing requirements.

He added: “The proposals in this consultation are intended to support the resourcing required for the effective operation of courts and tribunals.”

Changing the MRA requires parliamentary approval, and the MoJ confirmed that this will be sought as soon as parliamentary time allows. 
 

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Axiom Ince collapses: Police investigation begins

Tue Oct 03 2023

Barrister Carly Walters ordered to be disbarred

Tue Oct 03 2023

Fines to increase for employers without robust employment screening

Mon Oct 02 2023

IBA publishes for the first time a legal agenda identifying profession’s most pressing concerns

Mon Oct 02 2023

Black History Month: Legal profession celebrates influential Black women lawyers

Mon Oct 02 2023

The Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid

Fri Sep 29 2023

Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce

Fri Sep 29 2023

Families continue to be victims of a broken justice system

Fri Sep 29 2023

Call for compensation scheme extension to help more abuse survivors

Fri Sep 29 2023
FeaturedChris Packham legal action over Rishi Sunak's announcement
Chris Packham legal action over Rishi Sunak's announcement
Why civil mediation is the smarter choice than pressing for your day in court
Why civil mediation is the smarter choice than pressing for your day in court
SRA now managing the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
SRA now managing the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
Law Society concerned over fixed recoverable costs rollout
Law Society concerned over fixed recoverable costs rollout
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?