Ivy Solicitors Limited faces intervention by SRA

9 Dec 2025News

The Solicitors Regulation Authority has intervened in Ivy Solicitors Limited's operations due to conduct concerns

Ivy Solicitors Limited, located at 219 Chingford Mount Road, Chingford, London, E4 8LP, has been intervened in by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA). This significant intervention was enacted on 1 June 2023, amid serious allegations regarding one of its former consultants, Baykal Suruk. Shakespeare Martineau, situated at 1 Colmore Row, Birmingham, B4 6AA, is assisting in the closure of the firm.

Clients of Ivy Solicitors are advised that as a result of this intervention, the firm can no longer act on their behalf. They must now seek alternative legal representation. Clients unsure of where to turn can consult with their local Citizens Advice Bureau or explore options online through The Law Society’s resources.

The SRA's decision primarily concerns Baykal Suruk, who previously worked as a consultant in Ivy Solicitors' litigation department. Suruk was found to have engaged in dishonest behaviour towards a client. In November 2021, he accepted a cash payment amounting to £12,250 with the assurance that it would be used to advance court proceedings. However, Suruk failed to deposit this money into the firm's client account and did not utilise it as promised. When the client sought a refund, Suruk did not return the funds.

The SRA consequently imposed an order under section 43(2) of the Solicitors Act 1974, barring Suruk from involvement in any SRA-regulated legal practice without prior approval. The order came into effect immediately upon notification. The gravity of Suruk's dishonesty has been underscored, as it poses a risk to public trust in the legal profession.

In addition to the restrictions placed upon him, Suruk has also been ordered to pay a portion of the SRA's costs, totalling £1,350. The implications of this section 43 order are broad, preventing any solicitor, recognised body, or their respective managers and employees from employing or engaging him without specific SRA consent. This disappointing situation serves as a stark reminder of the severity of professional conduct standards within the legal community.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

Trust, transparency and the limits of legal self-regulation

Transparency reforms were meant to empower consumers, but uneven delivery now risks undermining confidence across the profession

Government scraps audit reform

What the collapse of the Audit Reform Bill means for regulation, accountability and legal practice

Sewage pollution litigation after Manchester Ship Canal

How the Supreme Court’s ruling is reshaping nuisance claims, protest litigation and regulatory limits across England and Wales

FCA non-financial misconduct rules clarified

The FCA’s final guidance on non-financial misconduct offers clarification, but leaves firms grappling with judgement-heavy implementation

Judiciary launches new diversity strategy initiative

The judiciary's new strategy aims to enhance diversity in the UK judicial system over five years

Personal injury claims numbers plummet dramatically

The number of personal injury claims in the UK has hit unprecedented lows, especially motor injury claims

Government urged to review legal costs

A senior costs lawyer has called for an independent review of fixed costs in the legal industry, highlighting the detrimental impact on firms and access to justice.

Building Safety Act litigation redefines investor risk

Recent case law shows how courts and tribunals are extending Building Safety Act liabilities beyond what investors originally anticipated

US musicians lose challenge over UK performers' rights restrictions

High Court rules treaty obligations non-justiciable in domestic law without parliamentary incorporation.

Actinon PTE Limited v Char Biocarbon Inc: Affirmation and contractual obligations

Commercial dispute highlights principles of waiver by election and contract interpretation

Matthew Haydon v R: Court of Appeal clarifies "likely" in explosive substances offences

Court confirms "likely" means "could well happen" rather than "more probable than not"

Cloisters Business Centre v Anvari: mixed-use premises and service charge protection

Court confirms tenants of mixed-use properties qualify for statutory service charge controls.

NHS commissioning activities fall outside TUPE protection, Court of Appeal rules

Employment law case clarifies when healthcare reorganisations trigger transfer protections for staff.

BTR Core Fund v HMRC: Upper Tribunal clarifies overpayment relief exclusions

Stamp duty land tax overpayment relief and the meaning of "mistake in a claim"

Court of Appeal rules criminal earnings count as income for ESA purposes

Criminal activity constitutes work and generates income for benefits assessment purposes.

SJ Interview: Joelle Grogan

Dr Joelle Grogan is a legal scholar specialising in the rule of law in times of crisis. She presents The Law Show on BBC Radio 4, and is Co-Academic Director of the Rule of Law Clinic at the CEU Democracy Institute (Budapest), and a Senior Research Fellow at the UCD Sutherland School of Law. Her work focuses on constitutional accountability, emergency powers, and legal misinformation. In this interview, she examines the pressures facing the rule of law in the UK, from executive power and court delays to media narratives, emergencies, and the impact of AI on legal practice.

Justice reform risks targeting the wrong fix

As 2026 approaches, ministers eye jury trials while ignoring deeper causes of England’s criminal justice crisis