Ignition Law promotes four outstanding team members

16 Apr 2025Appointments

Ignition Law has announced the promotion of Karishma Naravane, Michael Copeland, Catherine Campbell-Barnard and Djamela Magid

Leading commercial law firm Ignition Law has announced the promotion of four exceptional team members in a significant move towards growth and innovation. Karishma Naravane and Michael Copeland have been promoted to Corporate Legal Director while Catherine Campbell-Barnard takes on the role of Property Legal Director. Djamela Magid has achieved promotion to Senior Consultant within the Dispute Resolution team. These promotions are a testament to the remarkable contributions that each of these individuals has made to the firm. The Legal Director appointments recognise those who have consistently exceeded the expectations of the Senior Consultant role, demonstrating excellence in business development, leadership, and the delivery of high-quality client work. Ignition’s commitment to nurturing internal talent is evident in this latest round of promotions, embodying the firm’s ethos of fostering growth and opportunity. The success of these four individuals reflects Ignition’s dedication to its subscription-based model that champions working as consultants to SMEs

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

Resolving contested estates in the Court of Protection

As Baby Boomer wealth transfers accelerate, the Court of Protection is increasingly used to resolve inheritance disputes during lifetime

Frustration and property rights in land

While frustration is rooted in contract law, English courts have increasingly considered its potential application to leases and other proprietary rights in land

High Court denies BHP appeal request

High Court’s refusal of BHP’s appeal brings hope to over 620,000 claimants in the Mariana disaster

Howard League for Penal Reform v Secretary of State for Justice: High Court upholds PAVA deployment decision

Judicial review challenges deployment of incapacitant spray in Young Offender Institutions dismissed.

Pal v Accenture: EAT clarifies Polkey reductions and disability discrimination assessment

EAT examines unfair dismissal, Polkey principles, and disability discrimination in performance management cases.

Christopher Isaac Singh v Dr Prakashbhan Persad: Consultant obstetrician's duty to monitor foetal heart rate

Failure to ensure monitoring during emergency caesarean section constitutes medical negligence.

R (JSC) v Cambridgeshire County Council: High Court grants declaration for systemic SEND failures

Delays in EHC assessments breached statutory duties despite eventual completion

Município de Mariana v BHP Group: High Court awards £43m costs following liability victory

Brazilian claimants secure substantial interim costs order in dam collapse litigation

HMRC v MedPro Healthcare: Court of Appeal confirms Upper Tribunal's power to issue binding guidance on time extensions

Upper Tribunal can give binding guidance to FTT on discretionary time extensions

Stephenson v Daley: Knowledge and approval upheld despite long delay in probate challenge

Deceased's will leaving estate to partner instead of sons held valid on evidence

Olliers Solicitors launches wellbeing initiative

Olliers Solicitors has unveiled a comprehensive wellbeing programme aimed at supporting mental health for lawyers during 2026.

When pets become a family law issue

As pet ownership rises, family law struggles to reconcile animals’ sentience with their continued treatment as property

Abraaj Investment Management v Kes Power: Commercial estoppel and the assignment of receivables

High Court validates security assignment despite technical flaws through estoppel by convention principles.

Director of Public Prosecutions v Boureanu: Confiscation orders and the meaning of conviction

Romanian confiscation order enforced despite limitation preventing custodial sentence following corruption conviction.

Odusanya v Pennine Care Foundation Trust: witness evidence discussions and the right to representation

Strike-out appeal partially allowed where claimant denied consultation with representative during proceedings.

SJ Interview: Joelle Grogan

Dr Joelle Grogan is a legal scholar specialising in the rule of law in times of crisis. She presents The Law Show on BBC Radio 4, and is Co-Academic Director of the Rule of Law Clinic at the CEU Democracy Institute (Budapest), and a Senior Research Fellow at the UCD Sutherland School of Law. Her work focuses on constitutional accountability, emergency powers, and legal misinformation. In this interview, she examines the pressures facing the rule of law in the UK, from executive power and court delays to media narratives, emergencies, and the impact of AI on legal practice.

Justice reform risks targeting the wrong fix

As 2026 approaches, ministers eye jury trials while ignoring deeper causes of England’s criminal justice crisis