News EditorSolicitors Journal

Home Office announces changes to police crime recording processes

Home Office announces changes to police crime recording processes

Changes to processes estimated to save substantial amount of police time

The UK government’s Home Office announced new rules on 13 April, which are intended to free up police time in order to prioritise the victims of crime and pursue criminals by cutting unnecessary red tape when recording crime. The National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) estimates that the changes will save 443,000 hours of police time per year.

The new rules to address duplicate and unnecessary record keeping within the police force, follows findings by the NPCC’s Policing Productivity Review which has found, among other things, that over 443,000 officer hours could have been better used by reducing duplication, removing unnecessary administrative tasks and simplifying the process for cancelling unsubstantiated crime reports.

The changes, which will come into force in the coming weeks following recommendations to be issued by the NPCC lead for Crime Data Integrity, aim to: standardise counting rules with the ‘principal offence’ approach across the board, to record the crime which has the most impact on a victim; save police time by no longer recording cases of messages that might offend someone or where a public disturbance occurred but has been resolved, which will require sign-off by a supervisor; and make it easier to cancel recording of a crime where there’s enough evidence that none was committed, the sign-off required in this regard will depend on the gravity of the offence.

In practice, the changes will mean that all reported crimes for a single incident will be recorded under the ‘principal offence’, rather than as multiple entries on a database that effectively duplicates the incident. As such the changes intend to establish a more consistent and accurate approach to the recording of all offences by the police. In addition, the changes will make sure that the most serious charges against an individual are placed at the forefront of the investigation, so that perpetrators face the highest possible penalties.

Interim Lead for the NPCC Policing Productivity Review, Alan Pughsley QPM, said: “The Policing Productivity Review has been working closely with the Home Office, victims’ groups, and charities to reduce bureaucracy and simplify how we record crime to help refocus police efforts on preventing crime, keeping people safe and catching criminals. Evaluation by the review has shown that over 443,000 officer hours could be better used through a reduction in duplication, simplifying the process for cancelling crime reports when they are not substantiated. This work will ensure that officers can be more productive and spend more time on local priorities and activity that will give victims the service they deserve.”

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023

Attorney General presents UK intervention in Ukraine case against Russia at International Court of Justice

Thu Sep 21 2023

Firms losing potential clients by failing to return their calls, research shows

Thu Sep 21 2023

Powers of attorney modernised as legislation allows CILEX Lawyers to certify LPA copies for the first time

Thu Sep 21 2023

Stark contrast between Government response to Post Office Horizon victims and Infected Blood

Wed Sep 20 2023

ACSO comments on the Justice select Committee report:

Wed Sep 20 2023

Campaigners win permission to appeal against Sizewell C Nuclear Power Station ruling

Tue Sep 19 2023

Pre-inquest review into the deaths of Reading murder victims, James Furlong, Dr David Wails and Joseph Ritchie-Bennett

Mon Sep 18 2023
FeaturedAudit reform: if not now, when?
Audit reform: if not now, when?
Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero
Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero
The battle for talent – promoting diversity
The battle for talent – promoting diversity
BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social mediaSJ interview: Adrian Chopin
SJ interview: Adrian Chopin
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?