News EditorSolicitors Journal

HMRC publishes details of hundreds of businesses fined for breaching AML rules

HMRC publishes details of hundreds of businesses fined for breaching AML rules

The penalties relate to breaches of the Money Laundering Regulations

The UK’s HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) published the details of 240 supervised businesses that have been fined a total of £3.2 million between 1 July and 31 December 2022 for breaching the anti-money laundering (AML) regulations.

The named firms that have received penalties include Xpress Money Services Limited, which was fined £1.4 million for failures in carrying out risk assessments, having the correct policies, controls and procedures in place, and failures relating to conducting due diligence. A significant number of firms have been penalised for failing to apply for registration at the stipulated time. In addition to the named businesses, HMRC has fined another 179 companies combined penalties of over £200,000 for rule breaches.

According to HMRC’s press release, its work to combat financial crime alongside other agencies and government departments has resulted in the number of money service businesses falling from 1,508 in 2020 to 1,049 in 2023. According to government figures, the number of money service business agents has reduced from 35,507 to 30,217 during the same period.

Commenting on the announcement, Nick Sharp, HMRC’s Deputy Director of Economic Crime, Fraud Investigation Service, said: “Money laundering is not a victimless crime. We are here to help businesses protect themselves from criminal attacks and will continue to tackle the minority of businesses which do not comply with the Money Laundering Regulations. Serious and organised crime costs the UK billions of pounds every year and our anti-money laundering supervision is a vital tool in combatting that.”

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Attorney General presents UK intervention in Ukraine case against Russia at International Court of Justice

Thu Sep 21 2023

Firms losing potential clients by failing to return their calls, research shows

Thu Sep 21 2023

Powers of attorney modernised as legislation allows CILEX Lawyers to certify LPA copies for the first time

Thu Sep 21 2023

Stark contrast between Government response to Post Office Horizon victims and Infected Blood

Wed Sep 20 2023

ACSO comments on the Justice select Committee report:

Wed Sep 20 2023

Campaigners win permission to appeal against Sizewell C Nuclear Power Station ruling

Tue Sep 19 2023

Pre-inquest review into the deaths of Reading murder victims, James Furlong, Dr David Wails and Joseph Ritchie-Bennett

Mon Sep 18 2023

Feedback launches legal challenge to decision not to require food waste reporting

Fri Sep 15 2023

Failed whiplash reforms have created a ‘clear justice gap’

Thu Sep 14 2023
FeaturedThe Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA
The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA
Lessons in leadership from the front line
Lessons in leadership from the front line
Birdnesting and mortgages in divorce
Birdnesting and mortgages in divorce
Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood InquirySJ Interview: Chris Benson
SJ Interview: Chris Benson
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?