Deputy EditorSolicitors Journal

High Court clarifies inheritance disputes

High Court clarifies inheritance disputes

A High Court has today handed down a judgement in the case of Scarle v Scarle, which provides clarity on inheritance precedent.

A High Court has today handed down a judgement in the case of Scarle v Scarle, which provides clarity on inheritance precedent.

The case concerned two step-daughters, Anna Winter and Deborah Butler, who both potentially stood to inherit after the deaths of their parents John and Ann Scarle. Mr Scarle was the claimant’s father, while Mrs Scarle was the defendant’s mother.

The couple were found dead from hypothermia in their Essex home in 2016. The court was required to determine which of the two parents died first, in order to decide which daughter would receive the inheritance.

Whichever of the two died last would automatically have become the owner of the joint assets (including the family home), however experts were unable to prove the order of their deaths conclusively.

The defendant’s barrister James Weale explained that various pathologists observed that Mrs Scarle’s body was significantly more decomposed than Mr Scarle’s. However, it was also noted in court that rates of decomposition are highly sensitive to environmental conditions.

Having considered old case law relating to ship-wrecks and WWII air raids, Judge Philip Kramer concluded that: “The claimant has not satisfied me to the civil standard as to the order of death, it remains uncertain”.

As such, the order of death was decided on the basis of a legal presumption in s. 184 of the Law of Property Act 1925, which is that the oldest died first, in this case Mr Scarle, who was 79 – ten years his wife’s senior.

Law Hurst & Taylor partner Rachel Liebeschuetz said: “The judgment provides welcome clarification to this area of law, which has been uncertain for many years.”  

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero

Fri Sep 22 2023

BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social media

Fri Sep 22 2023

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023

Attorney General presents UK intervention in Ukraine case against Russia at International Court of Justice

Thu Sep 21 2023

Firms losing potential clients by failing to return their calls, research shows

Thu Sep 21 2023

Powers of attorney modernised as legislation allows CILEX Lawyers to certify LPA copies for the first time

Thu Sep 21 2023

Stark contrast between Government response to Post Office Horizon victims and Infected Blood

Wed Sep 20 2023

ACSO comments on the Justice select Committee report:

Wed Sep 20 2023
FeaturedThe dangers of funding assumptions
The dangers of funding assumptions
Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats
Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats
Legal Departments See Higher Matter Volumes but Flat or Declining Budgets: Thomson Reuters 2023 Legal Department Operations Index
Legal Departments See Higher Matter Volumes but Flat or Declining Budgets: Thomson Reuters 2023 Legal Department Operations Index
More Than 200 Employers Named And Shamed For Failing To Pay National Minimum Wage
More Than 200 Employers Named And Shamed For Failing To Pay National Minimum Wage
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?