Government plan seen as attack on justice system

10 Mar 2026News

The proposal to take interest from client accounts has raised concerns about access to legal advice and justice system funding

The UK government’s proposal to confiscate a significant portion of interest generated on lawyers’ client accounts has prompted strong reactions from legal experts. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) suggests that it could take between 50 and 75 per cent of the generated interest to support the justice system in England and Wales. However, the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) has issued a stern warning, describing the plan as another assault on the already struggling civil justice framework. In a recent consultation response, John McQuater from APIL remarked “It’s wrong to assume this is somehow ‘free money’. The MoJ taking a share of generated interest would amount to a stealth tax on the general public seeking legal advice, including vulnerable victims of negligence seeking redress.”

McQuater further articulated that the personal injury sector does not typically hold funds in client accounts for extended periods, therefore reducing the amount of interest that could be captured. He stated “In the personal injury sector money is not kept in client accounts for long periods,” emphasising the fleeting nature of these funds. The implications of the proposed plan could be particularly detrimental to smaller law firms, which rely on any retained interest from client accounts to help manage operational costs such as overdraft charges, as well as to create funding models that ultimately benefit clients.

According to McQuater, this represents a profound concern, especially when considering that “Injured people have been on the wrong end of 25 years of reform which have undermined access to justice and eaten away at the principle of full and fair compensation.” The apprehensions extend to the potential administration costs of the scheme, which may become a considerable burden for both the law firms and the MoJ. He observed that there does not appear to be any commitment from the MoJ on using the funds raised in a manner that would support individuals relying on the civil justice system, leading to calls for a comprehensive reevaluation of the proposal in light of its potential consequences.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

Government introduces support for rape victims

The UK Government is launching a new Independent Legal Advisor service for rape victims alongside courtroom reforms

Police officers challenge long-standing union ban

Police officers are resisting attempts by the Home Secretary to halt their court challenge against a statutory ban on trade union membership, asserting their rights under the European Convention on Human Rights

Duncan Lewis wins important legal ruling

Duncan Lewis Solicitors achieved a landmark ruling restoring a client’s access to public funds following an unlawful Home Office condition

O'Herlihy v Taylor: court refuses late inheritance act claim after four-year delay

High Court denies permission to bring 1975 Act claim nearly five years out of time.

Crane Bank v DFCU: high court clarifies disclosure thresholds under PD 57AD

A Commercial Court judgement refines when extended disclosure orders can be challenged or varied.

Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead v Cawley: High Court declines final injunction on return date pending welfare assessment

A local planning authority must demonstrate it has reassessed the balance of interests in light of emerging personal circumstances before a final injunction will be granted under section 187B of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

Sabbagh-Parry v Secretary of State for the Home Office: deportation challenge refused as premature

High Court refuses permission for judicial review of deportation proceedings against long-term UK resident.

Piecemeal reforms cannot solve justice backlogs

The Law Society warns that piecemeal reforms of the criminal justice system will not address court backlogs

Gareth Martin comments on the arrests of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Peter Mandelson

Perhaps not the ‘usual suspects’ but the recent arrests of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Peter Mandelson were most definitely typical of the headline-grabbing events that make everyone an armchair lawyer.

CMA launches review of private dentistry

The CMA is seeking input on private dentistry, focusing on consumer experiences and pricing transparency

New UK rules target foreign criminals

Foreign criminals will face strict new rules that prevent entry or cancel visas for offenders posing a threat

Swire v Canterbury City Council: EIA screening, park and ride capacity, and the limits of cumulative assessment

High Court dismisses judicial review of A2 slip road planning permission — [2026] EWHC 478 (Admin)

Shah Ali v General Medical Council: High Court upholds erasure from medical register

A doctor's removal from the medical register has been confirmed by the High Court following findings of dishonesty and dangerous driving, after successive tribunals concluded that further suspension would serve no useful purpose.

XY, Re: welfare deputyship, internet use and the court's ultimate authority

Internet and social media decisions fall outside standard welfare deputyship authority; the Court of Protection retains ultimate best interests jurisdiction regardless of deputy appointment.

SJ Interview: Ben Aram

Ben Aram is UK Managing Partner at Kennedys and co-head of its Corporate & Commercial division. A solicitor specialising in international arbitration and commercial litigation, he has led the expansion of the firm’s UK corporate practice and helped launch its global ESG group. In this interview, he reflects on law-firm leadership, scaling practices, partnership governance, and the skills lawyers need in a changing market.

Power Shifts, Responsibility Holds

From AI liability and freezing injunctions to private equity governance and regulatory reform, this issue traces a legal system adapting to new pressures while keeping accountability firmly human.