News EditorSolicitors Journal

Government announces measures to strengthen Procurement Bill

Government announces measures to strengthen Procurement Bill

The new measures to protect national security are being brought forward

The Cabinet Office announced on 7 June that the government has tabled amendments to the Procurement Bill to bring forward measures to strengthen national security in government contracts.

The two new measures are: the establishment of a National Security Unit for Procurement, which will be based in the Cabinet Office, and will investigate suppliers who may pose a risk to national security, and assess whether companies should be barred from public procurements; and new powers to ban suppliers from specific sectors, such as areas related to defence and national security, while allowing them to continue to be involved in procurement in non-sensitive areas.

In practice, the new provisions will enable ministers to consider the risk profile of suppliers during the procurement process for government contracts and allow for certain types of contracts to be identified on the supplier debarment list that a specific entity will not be allowed to bid for. The new unit’s responsibilities will include proactively monitoring the supplier landscape and recommending suppliers that should be investigated for debarment.

Alongside the announcement, the government has also committed to publishing a timeline for the removal of certain surveillance equipment, produced by entities subject to China’s National Intelligence Law, from sensitive government sites.

Commenting on the new measures, Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General Jeremy Quin said: “Protecting the nation’s security has always been the government’s number one job. These new measures will protect our sensitive sectors from companies which could threaten national security and are a firm deterrence to hostile actors who wish to do Britain harm. This builds on the robust rules within the Procurement Bill to hold suppliers to account and ensure that the taxpayer is protected.”

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023

Attorney General presents UK intervention in Ukraine case against Russia at International Court of Justice

Thu Sep 21 2023

Firms losing potential clients by failing to return their calls, research shows

Thu Sep 21 2023

Powers of attorney modernised as legislation allows CILEX Lawyers to certify LPA copies for the first time

Thu Sep 21 2023

Stark contrast between Government response to Post Office Horizon victims and Infected Blood

Wed Sep 20 2023

ACSO comments on the Justice select Committee report:

Wed Sep 20 2023

Campaigners win permission to appeal against Sizewell C Nuclear Power Station ruling

Tue Sep 19 2023

Pre-inquest review into the deaths of Reading murder victims, James Furlong, Dr David Wails and Joseph Ritchie-Bennett

Mon Sep 18 2023
FeaturedAudit reform: if not now, when?
Audit reform: if not now, when?
Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero
Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero
The battle for talent – promoting diversity
The battle for talent – promoting diversity
BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social mediaSJ interview: Adrian Chopin
SJ interview: Adrian Chopin
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?