News EditorSolicitors Journal

Getty Images files copyright claim against makers of AI image generating tool

Getty Images files copyright claim against makers of AI image generating tool

Claim filed in the UK High Court against Stability AI

Getty Images announced in January that it has begun legal proceedings against Stability AI, the maker of a free image generating tool, in the High Court of Justice in London for alleged violation of copyright.

Visual media company, Getty Images, which has more than 135 million copyrighted images in its archives, claims that Stability AI “unlawfully copied and processed millions of images protected by copyright and the associated metadata” that are owned or represented by the company without a licence. According to a statement issued by Getty Images, such alleged copyright violations benefited Stability AI’s commercial interests to the detriment of the content creators.

Artificial intelligence (AI) image generators use human-made images, including images scraped from the web, in order to train the software to create unique images from simple text instructions. Some artists and photographers have claimed that their work is frequently used in this way without their permission.

Getty Images has provided licences to technology firms to use its content in order to train AI systems. The company asserts that Stability AI did not seek to secure such a licence from Getty Images in order to use its images within its AI image tool Stable Diffusion.

A new report entitled ‘Communications and Digital Committee at Risk: Our Creative Future’ was published by the House of Lords on 17 January, which includes contributions from an array of industry experts on the benefits and risks to the UK government’s proposed changes to intellectual property (IP) law in light of new technology. The report concludes that the Intellectual Property Office should pause its proposed changes to the text and data mining regime immediately in order to conduct an impact assessment on the implications of AI and new technology for the creative industries. In addition to this, the report explains that “New technologies are making it easier and cheaper to reproduce and distribute creative works and image likenesses. Timely Government action is needed to prevent such disruption resulting in avoidable harm, or production moving to countries with better regulation.”

Meanwhile, a class-action lawsuit has been filed by several artists in the USA against Stability AI and several other companies for the alleged use of their images to train the Stability Diffusion system.

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation

Tue Sep 26 2023

Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law

Tue Sep 26 2023

Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats

Mon Sep 25 2023

Legal Departments See Higher Matter Volumes but Flat or Declining Budgets: Thomson Reuters 2023 Legal Department Operations Index

Mon Sep 25 2023

More Than 200 Employers Named And Shamed For Failing To Pay National Minimum Wage

Mon Sep 25 2023

Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero

Fri Sep 22 2023

BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social media

Fri Sep 22 2023

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023
FeaturedThe Pre-Action Protocol review final report – full steam ahead?
The Pre-Action Protocol review final report – full steam ahead?
New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka
Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka
A solicitor’s stance on EDI in the workplace
A solicitor’s stance on EDI in the workplace
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?