LoginSubscribe Now
Follow Us
Sign up to our free newsletter
Solicitors Journal LogoInforming the legal profession since 1856

Find the knowledge you need from the SJ library of over 20,000 legal articles

Search now
Solicitors Journal Logo
  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports
  • AI Search
  • Digital Edition
  • Subscription Options
  • Advertise with Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • FAQ
    • Guide to Authors
Solicitors Journal

Informing the legal profession since 1856.

Follow us

Topics

  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports

About

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • FAQ
  • Guide to Authors

Subscribe

  • Subscription Options
  • Digital Edition
  • Free Newsletter

Editorial

editorial@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Subscriptions

subscriptions@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Advertising

Advertise with usadvertising@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

© 2026 Solicitors Journal in partnership with the International In-house Counsel Journal

ISSN 0038-1047  ·  Images: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors

Terms and ConditionsCookie PolicyPrivacy PolicyPLS Clear logoCopyright & permissions
David VascottDavid Vascott

News, Features and Opinion Editor, Solicitors Journal

First collective action brought against water company for overcharging

9 Aug 2023News
Share:
First collective action brought against water company for overcharging

By David Vascott

A legal claim has been made against Severn Trent Water, which is accused of abusing its dominant market position by underreporting the extent of pollution discharge and overcharging customers as a result

The claim, by Professor Carolyn Roberts, an environmental and water consultant represented by Leigh Day, is the first such collective action. Leigh Day says further cases will be brought against Thames Water, United Utilities, Anglian Water, Yorkshire Water and Northumbrian Water in the coming months.

A press release by Leigh Day said:

All six water companies are accused of underreporting the number of times they cause pollution incidents by spilling or discharging sewage into waterways in breach of environmental rules. 

This is the first collective action case where the competition abuse centres on compliance with environmental laws and reporting responsibilities to regulators.

Professor Carolyn Roberts is bringing the claims on behalf of more than 20 million household customers who have been overcharged because of the companies allegedly abusing their monopoly position. The claim against Severn Trent Water is brought on behalf of 8 million customers.

The value of the claim against Severn Trent Water is estimated at over £330 million and the six claims are expected to lead to compensation payments of over £800 million in total, if successful.

The legal claims allege that the six water companies have been breaking competition law by misleading the Environment Agency and Ofwat as to the number of pollution incidents, being discharges or spills of untreated sewage they made into rivers, lakes, coastal areas, and other waterways causing damage to the environment.

Water companies are required to report such incidents as part of their legal duties and responsibilities, but it appears many pollution incidents have gone, and continue to go, unreported. The number of pollution incidents a company reports to their regulators is an important factor in determining the price water companies can ultimately charge for their services.
Professor Roberts argues in her legal claims that, if the water companies had correctly reported the number of pollution incidents, performance penalties would have been applied and this would have reduced how much customers were charged.

Anyone who has paid for a water bill to one or more of these water companies from April 2020 may be entitled to compensation if the case is successful; customers of Severn Trent Water may be entitled to compensation if they paid for a water bill from April 2017.

Compensation is being sought through competition opt-out collective proceedings, which allow legal claims to be brought by a single class representative on behalf of a group, or groups, of affected individuals in the Competition Appeal Tribunal.

Water UK, representing the industry, said: “This highly speculative claim is entirely without merit. The regulator has confirmed that over 99% of sewage works comply with their legal requirements. If companies fail to deliver on their commitments, then customer bills are already adjusted accordingly.”

Related Topics

  • Competition
  • Environment
  • Health & Safety
  • CILEx
  • Courts, Tribunals & Judiciary
  • Solicitors
  • The Bar

Latest Articles

The claim, by Professor Carolyn Roberts, an environmental and water consultant represented by Leigh Day, is the first such collective action. Leigh Day says further cases will be brought against Thames Water, United Utilities, Anglian Water, Yorkshire Water and Northumbrian Water in the coming months.

A press release by Leigh Day said:

All six water companies are accused of underreporting the number of times they cause pollution incidents by spilling or discharging sewage into waterways in breach of environmental rules. 

This is the first collective action case where the competition abuse centres on compliance with environmental laws and reporting responsibilities to regulators.

Professor Carolyn Roberts is bringing the claims on behalf of more than 20 million household customers who have been overcharged because of the companies allegedly abusing their monopoly position. The claim against Severn Trent Water is brought on behalf of 8 million customers.

The value of the claim against Severn Trent Water is estimated at over £330 million and the six claims are expected to lead to compensation payments of over £800 million in total, if successful.

The legal claims allege that the six water companies have been breaking competition law by misleading the Environment Agency and Ofwat as to the number of pollution incidents, being discharges or spills of untreated sewage they made into rivers, lakes, coastal areas, and other waterways causing damage to the environment.

Water companies are required to report such incidents as part of their legal duties and responsibilities, but it appears many pollution incidents have gone, and continue to go, unreported. The number of pollution incidents a company reports to their regulators is an important factor in determining the price water companies can ultimately charge for their services.
Professor Roberts argues in her legal claims that, if the water companies had correctly reported the number of pollution incidents, performance penalties would have been applied and this would have reduced how much customers were charged.

Anyone who has paid for a water bill to one or more of these water companies from April 2020 may be entitled to compensation if the case is successful; customers of Severn Trent Water may be entitled to compensation if they paid for a water bill from April 2017.

Compensation is being sought through competition opt-out collective proceedings, which allow legal claims to be brought by a single class representative on behalf of a group, or groups, of affected individuals in the Competition Appeal Tribunal.

Water UK, representing the industry, said: “This highly speculative claim is entirely without merit. The regulator has confirmed that over 99% of sewage works comply with their legal requirements. If companies fail to deliver on their commitments, then customer bills are already adjusted accordingly.”

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
SFO and HMRC use crypto orders
Solicitors Journal

SFO and HMRC use crypto orders

Gherson Solicitors LLP has shed light on the use of Crypto Wallet Freezing and Forfeiture Orders by UK agencies
News25 Jun 2026
FCA to assess integrity of lawyers
Solicitors Journal

FCA to assess integrity of lawyers

HM Treasury has announced that the FCA will regulate AML for legal and accounting professionals in the UK
News25 Jun 2026
Ockenden Report reveals serious maternity failings
Solicitors Journal

Ockenden Report reveals serious maternity failings

The newly published Ockenden Report highlights systemic issues in maternity care affecting over two thousand families
News25 Jun 2026
UK businesses advised to review contracts
Solicitors Journal

UK businesses advised to review contracts

UK businesses with Australian operations are urged to review employment contracts due to proposed non-compete reforms that could affect enforceability from 2027
News25 Jun 2026
Estatesearch expands international search services
Solicitors Journal

Estatesearch expands international search services

Legal tech firm Estatesearch has launched International Financial Profile searches to aid estate administration globally
News25 Jun 2026
Warner Bros Discovery and Paramount v Nokia: Patents Court sets interim RAND payment for global video streaming licence
Solicitors Journal

Warner Bros Discovery and Paramount v Nokia: Patents Court sets interim RAND payment for global video streaming licence

Patents Court determines interim RAND payment for Nokia's video portfolio in landmark streaming dispute.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
Barclays Bank UK Plc & Ors v Financial Ombudsman Service: High Court quashes FOS jurisdiction decisions over unfair credit relationships
Solicitors Journal

Barclays Bank UK Plc & Ors v Financial Ombudsman Service: High Court quashes FOS jurisdiction decisions over unfair credit relationships

High Court rules FOS exceeded its jurisdiction in four consumer credit complaints.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
Staniak v District Court of Lublin: High Court refuses permission on passage of time in Polish extradition appeal
Solicitors Journal

Staniak v District Court of Lublin: High Court refuses permission on passage of time in Polish extradition appeal

Permission refused on fugitivity, exceptional circumstances and oppression in long-running Poland extradition case.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
Barclay v Transport Secretary: High Court dismisses challenges to Gatwick Airport's Northern Runway Project DCO
Solicitors Journal

Barclay v Transport Secretary: High Court dismisses challenges to Gatwick Airport's Northern Runway Project DCO

Planning Court dismisses challenges to Gatwick Airport's Northern Runway Project Development Consent Order on all grounds.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
Hipgnosis Music v Merck Mercuriadis: High Court rules music publishing catalogues idea was not a corporate opportunity
Solicitors Journal

Hipgnosis Music v Merck Mercuriadis: High Court rules music publishing catalogues idea was not a corporate opportunity

High Court dismisses Hipgnosis Music's claims over diverted music catalogues corporate opportunity.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
Advance Magazine Publishers v Cornucopia Entertainment: IPEC finds Vanity Fair and GQ marks infringed by ticket advertising
Solicitors Journal

Advance Magazine Publishers v Cornucopia Entertainment: IPEC finds Vanity Fair and GQ marks infringed by ticket advertising

IPEC finds Condé Nast's Vanity Fair and GQ trade marks infringed by concierge ticket advertising.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
R (Hylton) v Medway Council: High Court quashes decisions refusing interim care support pending reassessment
Solicitors Journal

R (Hylton) v Medway Council: High Court quashes decisions refusing interim care support pending reassessment

High Court quashes Medway's interim care decisions for treating reassessment as a condition of support.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
Regal BA v Jun Zhang: High Court awards damages over failed sale of £16.9m mansion formerly rented by Harry Kane
Solicitors Journal

Regal BA v Jun Zhang: High Court awards damages over failed sale of £16.9m mansion formerly rented by Harry Kane

Developer awarded damages after buyer twice fails to complete purchase of Harry Kane's former home.
Court Report24 Jun 2026
SJ Interview: Chris Spelman
Solicitors Journal

SJ Interview: Chris Spelman

Chris Spelman is a partner in DWF's London dispute resolution team, specialising in financial services litigation and investigations, whistleblowing matters, and class action, securities and...
Interview1 Jun 2026
When the rules can't keep up
Solicitors Journal

When the rules can't keep up

From Westminster to the courts, the rules are being written faster than they can settle
Foreword1 Jun 2026