Deputy EditorSolicitors Journal

Family lawyers voice concerns over domestic violence review

Family lawyers voice concerns over domestic violence review

Two family law solicitors have co-ordinated a letter, signed by 37 experts, challenging the extent of the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) recent decision to review how the family courts deal with victims of domestic violence.

Two family law solicitors have co-ordinated a letter, signed by 37 experts, challenging the extent of the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) recent decision to review how the family courts deal with victims of domestic violence.

Ben Hoare Bell partner Cris McCurley and Beck Fitzgerald director Jenny Beck, along with others including victims commissioner Dame Vera Baird QC, have written to the justice secretary David Guake to say three months is insufficient time for proper scrutiny.

“Twelve weeks is not enough time to properly evaluate the reasons why the system is currently placing children and victims at unacceptable risk. Any inquiry must be independent if justice is to be seen to be done”, the letter said.

The MoJ launched three three-month inquiry into child protection in family courts last week, after more than 120 MPs called for a review on behalf of victims of domestic violence.

In the letter, the 37 signatories, said: “Whilst the government propose to take evidence from various sources, no mention is made of taking evidence from family lawyers who deal with these issues at the coal face, and can provide critical insight into the disparity in application of practice direction 12J in practice; identified by us as a "postcode lottery of protection".

“As lawyers working with this issue, we have significant concerns about the safeguarding of victims of abuse and their children because of the disconnect between the practice directions (particularly 12J), best practice guidelines and what happens in practice in court, on the ground every day across the country.”

The letter raises concerns that “Practice direction 12J is often ignored or ‘nodded through’ without any proper risk assessment, leaving women and children vulnerable.

“Where a fact-finding hearing is listed, the victim is increasingly being told to limit the number of allegations that can be considered by the judge, meaning that there is not a full forensic and expert assessment of the risks.”

The MoJ’s intends to use the results of the inquiry to build on the draft Domestic Abuse Bill, published in January. 

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

UN and coalition of NGOs write to Unilever to voice deep concern regarding victims of violence at Unilever tea plantation

Tue Sep 26 2023

Live Facial Recognition: How to Stay Within the Law

Tue Sep 26 2023

Ethics Institute launches taskforce to examine legal services to oligarchs and kleptocrats

Mon Sep 25 2023

Legal Departments See Higher Matter Volumes but Flat or Declining Budgets: Thomson Reuters 2023 Legal Department Operations Index

Mon Sep 25 2023

More Than 200 Employers Named And Shamed For Failing To Pay National Minimum Wage

Mon Sep 25 2023

Browne Jacobson collaborates with LGiU on report highlighting “critical” role of local government to hit net zero

Fri Sep 22 2023

BSB publishes new guidance on barristers’ conduct in non-professional life and on social media

Fri Sep 22 2023

The Chancery Lane Project expands to the USA

Thu Sep 21 2023

Delay in Final Report of the Infected Blood Inquiry

Thu Sep 21 2023
FeaturedNew report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
New report highlights the transformative effects of domestic abuse training on family lawyers
Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka
Asylum seekers stranded on Diego Garcia win challenge against return to Sri Lanka
A solicitor’s stance on EDI in the workplace
A solicitor’s stance on EDI in the workplace
New UK data protection bill may lighten the burden for business
New UK data protection bill may lighten the burden for business
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?