EditorSolicitors Journal

Ex senior crown prosecutor backs private prosecution of Dominic Cummings

Ex senior crown prosecutor backs private prosecution of Dominic Cummings

Nazir Afzal, a solicitor and former regional chief prosecutor, throws his hat into the ring saying the law is to be applied equally and fairly to all

Nazir Afzal, a solicitor and former regional chief prosecutor, has thrown his hat into the ring saying the law “is to be applied equally and fairly to all, or to nobody”.

His backing adds impetus to the campaign, being driven by Hodge Jones and Allen and Matthew Ryder QC, to persuade the police to re-investigate Cummings and prosecute him for breaching the coronavirus regulations if the evidence is there.

Afzal, who has lost his own brother to covid-19, said he was “horrified” by the prime minister “and others wrapping a shield” around the senior adviser.

He said there has to be consequences for law breaking otherwise the public loses confidence in those meant to enforce the law, and lose trust in the law itself.

Schwarz, who said Afzal feels he has “personal responsibility to ensure that justice is done and seen to be done”, said the campaign is pursuing two “serious concerns” – the first relating to Durham police.

He said they appear to have failed to follow up significant allegations about breaches of the regulations by Cummings while he was in Durham; and that neither the chief constable nor the police crime commissioner have responded to complaints made by the previous MP on behalf of the public.  

He added: “Similarly, the Metropolitan Police do not appear to have investigated properly, promptly or at all, allegations serious allegations about Dominic Cummings’ behaviour in London and elsewhere.

“Nor have they responded to the complaints made by members of public about his misconduct.”

He said the public’s “continued sense of injustice, frustration and anger can only begin to be addressed if there is openness and rigour on the part of the police. 

“Otherwise the perception remains and mounts that there is one rule for ordinary citizens and another for those in government."

Afzal commented: “The big divide was never between leave and remain, nor black and white, nor men and women, nor north and south.

“It's between those with power and those without. 

“The power differential is the greatest cause of inequality.”

He went on: “The law is to be applied equally and fairly to all, or to nobody. It needs to act, as I hope I have done throughout my career, without fear or favour.”

 

AdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisementAdvertisement
Latest News

Axiom Ince collapses: Police investigation begins

Tue Oct 03 2023

Barrister Carly Walters ordered to be disbarred

Tue Oct 03 2023

Fines to increase for employers without robust employment screening

Mon Oct 02 2023

IBA publishes for the first time a legal agenda identifying profession’s most pressing concerns

Mon Oct 02 2023

Black History Month: Legal profession celebrates influential Black women lawyers

Mon Oct 02 2023

The Law Society intervention ensures liberal approach to dealing with concurrent problems on legal aid

Fri Sep 29 2023

Jeanne Kelly elected President of the British Irish Chamber of Commerce

Fri Sep 29 2023

Families continue to be victims of a broken justice system

Fri Sep 29 2023

Call for compensation scheme extension to help more abuse survivors

Fri Sep 29 2023
FeaturedChris Packham legal action over Rishi Sunak's announcement
Chris Packham legal action over Rishi Sunak's announcement
Why civil mediation is the smarter choice than pressing for your day in court
Why civil mediation is the smarter choice than pressing for your day in court
SRA now managing the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
SRA now managing the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
Law Society concerned over fixed recoverable costs rollout
Law Society concerned over fixed recoverable costs rollout
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
SJ Interview: Hannah Ambrose
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?
Whose human rights are more important, yours or mine?