David Watson fights for health recognition

David Watson battles to have his health issues acknowledged as a consequence of football-related injuries
Former England football captain David Watson is currently engaged in a legal struggle to have his neurological condition recognised as stemming from the repeated head injuries he endured throughout his football career. Now faced with what medical professionals have described as “probable Alzheimer’s” and “probable CTE” (chronic traumatic encephalopathy), David, alongside his wife Penny, argues that acknowledging the connection between his injuries and current condition is essential for securing industrial injury benefits.
During the 1970s and 80s, David had a prolific career at the top of English football, during which he sustained numerous collisions, headers and impacts in both matches and training. This rising awareness of the impact of brain injuries in footballers has led to greater scrutiny of the long-term effects experienced by former players, many of whom now battle conditions such as dementia linked to prior head trauma. David's claim is also supported by the Professional Footballers’ Association (PFA) as he navigates this challenging journey.
Legal proceedings have progressed, with David's case previously heard before the First-tier Tribunal (FTT), which acknowledged that he suffered 10 documented head injuries classified as accidents during his career. Additionally, Penny's testimony suggested that these injuries represent just a small portion of David's overall head trauma. However, the tribunal ultimately rejected David's appeal against the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)'s decision to deny him industrial injury benefits, concluding that there was insufficient evidence to prove a direct link between these incidents and his current health decline.
Notably, the FTT opined that the cumulative effects of playing football over many years, along with numerous undocumented injuries, could have resulted in the same neurological decline even had the recognised accidents not occurred. The PFA has voiced support for David's appeal, which is set to be heard by the Upper Tribunal on 1 October 2025. The tribunal will reassess whether the FTT made any legal errors during its original ruling. The appeal will contend that the tribunal improperly regarded repeated head injuries as a mere “process” instead of distinct accidents, failed to present adequate reasoning for its conclusions, and made flawed inferences regarding David's family health history.
Should the appeal be successful, it could lead to a reconsideration of David's case by the FTT under corrected legal principles. David's case is represented by Ryan Bradshaw, a human rights solicitor at Leigh Day. Penny expressed her emotions succinctly, stating, “David has always been proud of what he achieved in football, but the reality is that the game has left him with a devastating illness.” She emphasised the need for his injuries to be acknowledged as real accidents with lasting consequences while hoping that other families in similar situations will see their experiences validated.
Dr Adam White, the Director of Brain Health at the PFA, commented on the matter, saying, “David and Penny have shown remarkable strength in speaking out about the challenges they face.” He further reinforced the necessity for formal recognition of the long-term impacts of head injuries, iterating the PFA's commitment to supporting both David and other former players in similar circumstances. Ryan Bradshaw remarked on the tribunal's acceptance of David's multiple head injuries, expressing hope that the Upper Tribunal will reconsider the case favourably based on their interpretation of the law.