LoginSubscribe Now
Follow Us
Sign up to our free newsletter
Solicitors Journal LogoInforming the legal profession since 1856

Find the knowledge you need from the SJ library of over 20,000 legal articles

Search now
Solicitors Journal Logo
  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports
  • AI Search
  • Digital Edition
  • Subscription Options
  • Advertise with Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • FAQ
    • Guide to Authors
Solicitors Journal

Informing the legal profession since 1856.

Follow us

Topics

  • Legal News
  • Opinion
  • Features
  • Practice Notes
  • Business
  • International
  • Court Reports

About

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • FAQ
  • Guide to Authors

Subscribe

  • Subscription Options
  • Digital Edition
  • Free Newsletter

Editorial

editorial@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Subscriptions

subscriptions@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

Advertising

Advertise with usadvertising@solicitorsjournal.com+44 (0)1223 750 755

© 2026 Solicitors Journal in partnership with the International In-house Counsel Journal

ISSN 0038-1047  ·  Images: Freepix, Unsplash and by permission of the authors

Terms and ConditionsCookie PolicyPrivacy PolicyPLS Clear logoCopyright & permissions

Courts service centres improving justice

25 Mar 2025|News|Add your comment
Share:
Courts service centres improving justice

The Courts and Tribunals Service Centres (CTSCs) centralise case administration, enhancing efficiency, accessibility, and user support across England and Wales

The Courts and Tribunals Service Centres (CTSCs) were introduced through the HMCTS Reform Programme to modernise case management for digital services, streamlining processes and improving user access to justice. Call handlers and agents provide crucial guidance, ensuring court and tribunal users receive consistent support and information.

Service Centres form one of three pillars of National Services, alongside National Business Centres (NBCs) and Enforcement. There are currently five Service Centres across England and Wales, based in Stoke-on-Trent, Birmingham, Loughborough, Salford, and Newport. Prior to 2019, administrative tasks and case queries were handled by individual courts, often relying on paper-based processes that led to inconsistencies, inefficiencies, and increased risks of error. The move to centralised digital systems has significantly improved service delivery, reducing costs and providing users with greater visibility of their cases.

Benefits of centralisation

Centralising case administration has brought several advantages, including faster processing times, a more consistent user experience, and a single point of contact for legal professionals. Multi-skilled teams now handle various tasks across services, ensuring greater flexibility and allowing court-based staff to focus on local issues. The introduction of digital systems has also reduced reliance on paper, minimised postage costs, and provided real-time case updates for users.

Legal professionals and individuals can now manage their applications online, with instant access to case histories and quicker feedback on case outcomes. Acknowledging that some users require additional support, CTSCs continue to accept paper applications and offer multiple communication channels, including telephone and webchat support.

In 2024, Service Centres and National Business Centres handled over 2.8 million telephone calls, responded to over 519,000 emails, and processed more than 25,000 webchat messages. On average, calls were resolved within 14 minutes. Enhanced contact management systems enable better handling of enquiries and provide valuable data insights into service performance.

User feedback and case studies

User feedback has been overwhelmingly positive, with over 73% of surveyed users expressing satisfaction with the service. One user noted: "Your staff were professional, polite, compassionate, empathetic and showed good listening abilities. They addressed my concerns and queries efficiently and effectively. Great service in emotionally trying times." Another commented: "Very helpful, polite and answered my questions and gave all the information needed very clearly and concisely."

A case study involving two Service Centre agents, Ryan and John, highlighted the impact of these reforms. They assisted a caller experiencing significant distress after a delay in processing his application. Through prompt action and direct communication with the court, they located the missing file and expedited the process. Ryan explained: "We soon found his file wasn’t where it was supposed to be, and the court were not aware of this. My team acted quickly to locate the file, while keeping him on board and calm. We contacted the court, where the judge understood the urgency of the case and granted an order. By taking initiative and having autonomy to make decisions we were able to make this happen quickly." He also emphasised the benefits of digital transformation, adding: "This gentleman’s case was an old-style paper case. However, if this had been a digital case what took five days to resolve, would have taken under five minutes."

Collaboration and future plans

Service Centres work closely with courts and tribunals to ensure seamless access to justice. Strong communication channels and clearly defined roles have enabled successful partnerships across the justice system. Looking ahead, future improvements include enhancing digital platforms, expanding the complexity of tasks handled by Service Centres, and assessing opportunities to centralise more services where appropriate. By continuing to evolve and refine the system, CTSCs aim to further improve efficiency and accessibility for all users of the justice system.

Comments

Latest Articles

The Courts and Tribunals Service Centres (CTSCs) were introduced through the HMCTS Reform Programme to modernise case management for digital services, streamlining processes and improving user access to justice. Call handlers and agents provide crucial guidance, ensuring court and tribunal users receive consistent support and information.

Service Centres form one of three pillars of National Services, alongside National Business Centres (NBCs) and Enforcement. There are currently five Service Centres across England and Wales, based in Stoke-on-Trent, Birmingham, Loughborough, Salford, and Newport. Prior to 2019, administrative tasks and case queries were handled by individual courts, often relying on paper-based processes that led to inconsistencies, inefficiencies, and increased risks of error. The move to centralised digital systems has significantly improved service delivery, reducing costs and providing users with greater visibility of their cases.

Benefits of centralisation

Centralising case administration has brought several advantages, including faster processing times, a more consistent user experience, and a single point of contact for legal professionals. Multi-skilled teams now handle various tasks across services, ensuring greater flexibility and allowing court-based staff to focus on local issues. The introduction of digital systems has also reduced reliance on paper, minimised postage costs, and provided real-time case updates for users.

Legal professionals and individuals can now manage their applications online, with instant access to case histories and quicker feedback on case outcomes. Acknowledging that some users require additional support, CTSCs continue to accept paper applications and offer multiple communication channels, including telephone and webchat support.

In 2024, Service Centres and National Business Centres handled over 2.8 million telephone calls, responded to over 519,000 emails, and processed more than 25,000 webchat messages. On average, calls were resolved within 14 minutes. Enhanced contact management systems enable better handling of enquiries and provide valuable data insights into service performance.

User feedback and case studies

User feedback has been overwhelmingly positive, with over 73% of surveyed users expressing satisfaction with the service. One user noted: "Your staff were professional, polite, compassionate, empathetic and showed good listening abilities. They addressed my concerns and queries efficiently and effectively. Great service in emotionally trying times." Another commented: "Very helpful, polite and answered my questions and gave all the information needed very clearly and concisely."

A case study involving two Service Centre agents, Ryan and John, highlighted the impact of these reforms. They assisted a caller experiencing significant distress after a delay in processing his application. Through prompt action and direct communication with the court, they located the missing file and expedited the process. Ryan explained: "We soon found his file wasn’t where it was supposed to be, and the court were not aware of this. My team acted quickly to locate the file, while keeping him on board and calm. We contacted the court, where the judge understood the urgency of the case and granted an order. By taking initiative and having autonomy to make decisions we were able to make this happen quickly." He also emphasised the benefits of digital transformation, adding: "This gentleman’s case was an old-style paper case. However, if this had been a digital case what took five days to resolve, would have taken under five minutes."

Collaboration and future plans

Service Centres work closely with courts and tribunals to ensure seamless access to justice. Strong communication channels and clearly defined roles have enabled successful partnerships across the justice system. Looking ahead, future improvements include enhancing digital platforms, expanding the complexity of tasks handled by Service Centres, and assessing opportunities to centralise more services where appropriate. By continuing to evolve and refine the system, CTSCs aim to further improve efficiency and accessibility for all users of the justice system.

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com|PLS LogoCopyright & permissions
Trustee mistakes after Pitt v Holt: a global divide
Solicitors Journal

Trustee mistakes after Pitt v Holt: a global divide

Divergent responses to Pitt v Holt have transformed remedial relief into a competitive feature of international trust jurisdictions
Feature7 Aug 2026
High Court ruling enhances SEND protections
Solicitors Journal

High Court ruling enhances SEND protections

The High Court's recent ruling clarifies legal obligations for schools concerning the exclusion of children with SEND
News7 Aug 2026
Diversity Summer Scheme inspires future lawyers
Solicitors Journal

Diversity Summer Scheme inspires future lawyers

More than 500 aspiring lawyers participated in the Government Legal Profession Diversity Summer Scheme, gaining invaluable insights through practical experiences and networking opportunities
News7 Aug 2026
MUF v Secretary of State for Defence: High Court quashes fourth ARAP refusal for Afghan judge
Solicitors Journal

MUF v Secretary of State for Defence: High Court quashes fourth ARAP refusal for Afghan judge

High Court quashes fourth refusal of Afghan judge's relocation application under ARAP scheme.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
Mohammed Sarwar v Bilal Sarwar: High Court dismisses unfair prejudice petition over hotel business split
Solicitors Journal

Mohammed Sarwar v Bilal Sarwar: High Court dismisses unfair prejudice petition over hotel business split

High Court rejects family's unfair prejudice claim after finding hotel business division agreement genuine.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
David Hill v HMRC: Upper Tribunal clarifies scope of reasonable excuse based on adviser reliance
Solicitors Journal

David Hill v HMRC: Upper Tribunal clarifies scope of reasonable excuse based on adviser reliance

Upper Tribunal partly allows appeal over penalties for non-compliance with HMRC information notices.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
Code Students v Nottingham City Council: High Court refuses judicial review over rival scheme approval
Solicitors Journal

Code Students v Nottingham City Council: High Court refuses judicial review over rival scheme approval

High Court refuses permission for judicial review of Nottingham student accommodation planning decision.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
KDY v Nicholas Langham: High Court strikes out 300-page claim against eleven defendants
Solicitors Journal

KDY v Nicholas Langham: High Court strikes out 300-page claim against eleven defendants

High Court strikes out sprawling multi-defendant claim brought by mother on behalf of disabled son.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
David Abbott v Ministry of Defence: High Court orders 60% costs in hearing loss litigation
Solicitors Journal

David Abbott v Ministry of Defence: High Court orders 60% costs in hearing loss litigation

High Court orders Ministry of Defence to pay 60% of costs in hearing loss litigation.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
SOCAR v Mubariz Mansimov: Commercial Court retains jurisdiction over Palmali asset-stripping claims
Solicitors Journal

SOCAR v Mubariz Mansimov: Commercial Court retains jurisdiction over Palmali asset-stripping claims

Commercial Court dismisses jurisdiction challenge to SOCAR's claims over alleged Palmali asset restructurings.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
York SD Limited v HMRC: Upper Tribunal grants partial permission to appeal in EIS solar panel case
Solicitors Journal

York SD Limited v HMRC: Upper Tribunal grants partial permission to appeal in EIS solar panel case

Upper Tribunal partly allows appeal permission over enterprise investment scheme relief in solar panel dispute.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
CDE v NHS North East London ICB: High Court refuses judicial review over disabled child's care plan
Solicitors Journal

CDE v NHS North East London ICB: High Court refuses judicial review over disabled child's care plan

Deputy High Court judge refuses permission for judicial review over care provision for life-limited teenager.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
Aerotron v Hermes Aviation: High Court grants stay of enforcement pending appeal
Solicitors Journal

Aerotron v Hermes Aviation: High Court grants stay of enforcement pending appeal

Master Fontaine stays enforcement of Maltese judgement debt pending Aerotron's appeal against recognition ruling.
Court Report7 Aug 2026
SJ Interview: Hannah Field
Solicitors Journal

SJ Interview: Hannah Field

Hannah Field, head of Shoosmiths’ London office and its Dispute Resolution & Litigation team in London, speaks to Solicitors Journal about the firm’s growth strategy,...
Interview28 Jul 2026
The judgement behind the answer
Solicitors Journal

The judgement behind the answer

Foreword7 Aug 2026