Costs ruling will boost demand for lawyers

8 Dec 2025News

The Mazur ruling is set to significantly increase costs disputes

Demand will be driven up for Costs Lawyers expertise in litigation and advocacy as determined by the Association of Costs Lawyers annual survey Findings from the survey of 79 Costs Lawyers indicated that three-quarters believe the ruling will necessitate the services of authorised Costs Lawyers rather than costs draftspeople. Furthermore, 68% of respondents anticipate a rise in candidates pursuing the Costs Lawyer Professional Qualification. The ruling is already influencing challenges against solicitor bills lacking evidence of supervision, with 71% of Costs Lawyers expecting a surge in these cases. Moreover, while not directly addressing rights of audience, the ruling appears to be prompting judges to scrutinise qualifications of those presenting cases, as indicated by 43% of respondents predicting that this practise will become more frequent. The ACL aims to obtain a Royal Charter for statutory protection of the professional title, and two-thirds of members believe this has gained urgency since the ruling. Additionally, in response to the forthcoming Civil Justice Council review, there is a strong call for streamlining the categorisation of bills, improving assessment processes, and enhancing consumer protections. Though just over a third of Costs Lawyers are using AI, the majority are cautiously exploring its potential to improve efficiency. Despite these advancements, the results also highlight ongoing concerns with budget adherence among solicitors, with a significant percentage reported as overspending. The ACL chair David Bailey-Vella noted that the Mazur ruling has illuminated the importance of the independent rights Costs Lawyers acquire through their qualifications, adding that the profession is thriving and beginning to embrace AI for efficiency while maintaining a focus on complex legal work that requires specialised knowledge

Legal News desk contact: editorial@solicitorsjournal.com

Latest Articles

Trust, transparency and the limits of legal self-regulation

Transparency reforms were meant to empower consumers, but uneven delivery now risks undermining confidence across the profession

Government scraps audit reform

What the collapse of the Audit Reform Bill means for regulation, accountability and legal practice

Sewage pollution litigation after Manchester Ship Canal

How the Supreme Court’s ruling is reshaping nuisance claims, protest litigation and regulatory limits across England and Wales

FCA non-financial misconduct rules clarified

The FCA’s final guidance on non-financial misconduct offers clarification, but leaves firms grappling with judgement-heavy implementation

Judiciary launches new diversity strategy initiative

The judiciary's new strategy aims to enhance diversity in the UK judicial system over five years

Personal injury claims numbers plummet dramatically

The number of personal injury claims in the UK has hit unprecedented lows, especially motor injury claims

Government urged to review legal costs

A senior costs lawyer has called for an independent review of fixed costs in the legal industry, highlighting the detrimental impact on firms and access to justice.

Building Safety Act litigation redefines investor risk

Recent case law shows how courts and tribunals are extending Building Safety Act liabilities beyond what investors originally anticipated

US musicians lose challenge over UK performers' rights restrictions

High Court rules treaty obligations non-justiciable in domestic law without parliamentary incorporation.

Actinon PTE Limited v Char Biocarbon Inc: Affirmation and contractual obligations

Commercial dispute highlights principles of waiver by election and contract interpretation

Matthew Haydon v R: Court of Appeal clarifies "likely" in explosive substances offences

Court confirms "likely" means "could well happen" rather than "more probable than not"

Cloisters Business Centre v Anvari: mixed-use premises and service charge protection

Court confirms tenants of mixed-use properties qualify for statutory service charge controls.

NHS commissioning activities fall outside TUPE protection, Court of Appeal rules

Employment law case clarifies when healthcare reorganisations trigger transfer protections for staff.

BTR Core Fund v HMRC: Upper Tribunal clarifies overpayment relief exclusions

Stamp duty land tax overpayment relief and the meaning of "mistake in a claim"

Court of Appeal rules criminal earnings count as income for ESA purposes

Criminal activity constitutes work and generates income for benefits assessment purposes.

SJ Interview: Joelle Grogan

Dr Joelle Grogan is a legal scholar specialising in the rule of law in times of crisis. She presents The Law Show on BBC Radio 4, and is Co-Academic Director of the Rule of Law Clinic at the CEU Democracy Institute (Budapest), and a Senior Research Fellow at the UCD Sutherland School of Law. Her work focuses on constitutional accountability, emergency powers, and legal misinformation. In this interview, she examines the pressures facing the rule of law in the UK, from executive power and court delays to media narratives, emergencies, and the impact of AI on legal practice.

Justice reform risks targeting the wrong fix

As 2026 approaches, ministers eye jury trials while ignoring deeper causes of England’s criminal justice crisis